HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANUROOP SINGHI
CHHAMMA SAHU D/O SHRI RAMKARAN SAHU WIFE OF SHRI SURAJ GOSWAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLW / 720 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:20107]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 720/2026
1. Chhamma Sahu D/o Shri Ramkaran Sahu, Wife Of Shri
Suraj Goswami, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of
Undaliya Ki Dungri, Shiv Colony, Bundi, District Bundi
(Raj). At Present Resident Of Shiv Colony, Bundi (Raj).
2. Suraj Goswami Son Of Shri Pappu Goswami, Aged About
24 Years, Resident Of Shiv Colony, Bundi, Police Station
Sadar Bundi, District Bundi (Raj).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Home Affairs And Justice, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj).
2. Superintendent Of Police, Bundi, District Bundi (Raj).
3. Nodal Officer, Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi
(Raj).
4. S.h.o. Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi (Raj).
5. Ramkaran Sahu Son Of Late Kajod Sahu, Resident Of
Undaliya Ki Dungri, Shiv Colony, Bundi, District Bundi
(Raj).
6. Smt. Vimla Wife Of Ramkaran Sahu, Resident Of Undaliya
Ki Dungri, Shiv Colony, Bundi, District Bundi (Raj).
7. Deepak Son Of Shri Ramraj, Resident Of Undaliya Ki
Dungri, Shiv Colony, Bundi, District Bundi (Raj).
8. Pappu Teli Son Of Not Known, Resident Of Kherkata
Basoli, District Bundi (Raj).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishnu Bohra
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order
12/05/2026
1. The defects as pointed out by the Registry are over-ruled.
(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 08:06:26 AM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 03:51:04 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:20107] (2 of 4) [CRLW-720/2026]
2. Both the petitioners who are present in-person before this
Court are major and in support of their date of birth, copies of
Class X Marksheet and/or Aadhaar card have been filed as
Annexure No.1.
3. Petitioners have also been duly identified by their counsel.
4. By virtue of the present criminal writ petition filed under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have
sought protection of their life and personal liberty from private
respondent Nos.5 to 8, as they are apprehending danger to their
life and liberty from the said private respondents.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have solemnized their marriage on 05.05.2026
(Annexure-2) and the same has been duly registered in the Office
of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur, Jaipur,
Rajasthan. Learned counsel further submits that the private
respondents and others are not happy with their marriage and the
petitioners are receiving continuous threats.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the
petitioners are major and are mature enough to take independent
decision of their life.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that once
the petitioners have willingly and with utmost responsibility have
chosen to solemnize their marriage, the private respondents have
no right to harass, much less threaten the petitioners and take law
in their hands and given the fact that the life and liberty of the
petitioners is in danger, police protection deserves to be granted
to the petitioners and hence, protection is being sought.
(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 08:06:26 AM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 03:51:04 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:20107] (3 of 4) [CRLW-720/2026]
8. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that appropriate directions
be issued.
9. As the order intended to be passed herein is non-prejudicial
to the private respondents, no notices are required to be issued to
them.
10. It is a well settled legal position as expounded by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India in Lata Singh Vs. State of UP reported
in (2006) 5 SCC 475, Shakti Vahini Vs. Union of India
reported in (2018) 7 SCC 1992 and Shafin Jahan vs. Asokan
KM & Ors. reported in (2018) 16 SCC 368, that the right of two
consenting adults to marry a person of their choice is a
fundamental right under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of
India. It has been consistently held that the autonomy of
individuals in matters of marriage and personal relations cannot
be curtailed by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.