HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANUROOP SINGHI
NISHA KHAN DAUGHTER OF SHRI ISHAK KHAN WIFE OF SHRI AASHIF KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLW / 722 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JP:20109]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 722/2026
1. Nisha Khan Daughter Of Shri Ishak Khan, Wife Of Shri
Aashif Khan, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Mohalla
Talaiya, Dashera Road, Kothi, Ward No. 30, Dholpur (Raj.)
2. Aashif Khan Son Of Shri Safik Khan, Aged About 26
Years, Resident Of Mohalla Talaiya, Dashera Road, Kothi,
Ward No. 30, Dholpur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal
Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur, District Dholpur (Raj.)
4. S.h.o. Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Raj.)
5. Ishak Son Of Shri Alladin, Resident Of Mohalla Talaiya,
Dashera Road, Kothi, Ward No. 30, Dholpur (Raj.)
6. Shahnaz Wife Of Shri Ishak, Resident Of Mohalla Talaiya,
Dashera Road, Kothi, Ward No. 30, Dholpur (Raj.)
7. Zayad Son Of Shri Sattar, Aged About 50 Years, Resident
Of Mohalla Talaiya, Dashera Road, Kothi, Ward No. 30,
Dholpur (Raj.)
8. Sarfaraz Son Of Unknown, Resident Of Mohalla Talaiya,
Dashera Road, Kothi, Ward No. 30, Dholpur (Raj.)
9. Tarana Daughter Of Shri Ishak, Resident Of Mohalla
Talaiya, Dashera Road, Kothi, Ward No. 30, Dholpur (Raj.)
10. Zishan Son Of Shri Ishak, Resident Of Mohalla Talaiya,
Dashera Road, Kothi, Ward No. 30, Dholpur (Raj.)
11. Farhan Son Of Shri Ishak, Resident Of Mohalla Talaiya,
Dashera Road, Kothi, Ward No. 30, Dholpur (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nagama Bano
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order
12/05/2026
(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 09:21:33 AM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 03:51:26 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JP:20109] (2 of 4) [CRLW-722/2026]
1. The defects as pointed out by the Registry are over-ruled.
2. Both the petitioners who are present in-person before this
Court are major and in support of their date of birth, copies of
Aadhaar card have been filed as Annexure No.1 (colly.).
3. Petitioners have also been duly identified by their counsel.
4. By virtue of the present criminal writ petition filed under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have
sought protection of their life and personal liberty from private
respondent Nos.5 to 11, as they are apprehending danger to their
life and liberty from the said private respondents.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have solemnized their marriage on 02.05.2026
(Annexure-2) at Mansoor Panchayat Sanstha, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
Learned counsel further submits that the private respondents and
others are not happy with their marriage and the petitioners are
receiving continuous threats.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the
petitioners are major and are mature enough to take independent
decision of their life.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that once
the petitioners have willingly and with utmost responsibility have
chosen to solemnize their marriage, the private respondents have
no right to harass, much less threaten the petitioners and take law
in their hands and given the fact that the life and liberty of the
petitioners is in danger, police protection deserves to be granted
to the petitioners and hence, protection is being sought.
8. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that appropriate directions
be issued.
(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 09:21:33 AM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 03:51:26 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JP:20109] (3 of 4) [CRLW-722/2026]
9. As the order intended to be passed herein is non-prejudicial
to the private respondents, no notices are required to be issued to
them.
10. It is a well settled legal position as expounded by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India in Lata Singh Vs. State of UP reported
in (2006) 5 SCC 475, Shakti Vahini Vs. Union of India
reported in (2018) 7 SCC 1992 and Shafin Jahan vs. Asokan
KM & Ors. reported in (2018) 16 SCC 368, that the right of two
consenting adults to marry a person of their choice is a
fundamental right under Articles 19 an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.