2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15218
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI,
NUPUR BHATI
UNA RAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 8496 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:22360-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8496/2026
Una Ram S/o Shri Magaji, aged about 55 Years, R/o Village
Mudtrasili, Tehsil Jaswantpura, District Jalore Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, through its Principal Secretary,
The Department Of Revenue Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2. District Collector, Jalore, Rajasthan.
3. Tehsildar Jaswantpura, District Jalore, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripudaman Singh
For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, AAG
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order
11/05/2026
1. The instant writ petition has been preferred claiming the
following reliefs :-
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this writ
petition may kindly be allowed, and
10.1 By An Appropriate Writ Order Or Direction to the
respondents to remove the encroachments made in the
Khasra no. 639, 640, 642, 645 AND 457 which is recorded as
gair mumkin rasta, gair mumkin nada, gair mumkinsamshan
and barani of village Mudtrasili Tehsil Jaswantpura, District
Jalore.
10.2 By an appropriate writ order or direction, the
respondents may kindly be directed to restore Land of Khasra
no. 639, 640, 642, 645 AND 457 which are recorded as gair
mumkin rasta, gair mumkin nada, gair mumkinsamshan and
barani of village Mudtrasili Tehsil Jaswantpura, District Jalore."
(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 01:16:55 PM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 06:32:08 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:22360-DB] (2 of 4) [CW-8496/2026]
2. A Division Bench of this Court in Jagdish Prashad Meena &
Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL)
No.10819/2018, vide order dated 30.01.2019, has directed creation of
Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) for rural areas in every district;
the relevant portion of the order reads as follows :-
"This Court is inundated with large number of writ petitions,
styled as public interest litigation, from almost all the
Districts of the State, with allegations of encroachment over
the pasture land/ land of ‘johad’, ‘talab’/ river/river
bed/public way/ Shamshan/Kabristan etc. In all such
petitions, common allegation is that despite repeated
complaints/representations to the concerned revenue
officers, no steps are taken by them to remove the
encroachment. This results in number of writ petitions being
filed by the complainants/representationists before this
Court. This Court has been passing orders in such matters
requiring the respective District Collectors to examine the
factual content of the allegations and take steps to remove
the encroachments so as to secure such land.
In order therefore to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution to
this ever persisting problem, we deem it appropriate to
direct the Chief Secretary of the State to devise a
permanent mechanism, which should be operational in every
District of the State where the concerned District Collector
should be required to periodically notify for the information
of the general public to lodge the complaints/representations
with regard to such encroachments with a specially
designated Public Land Protection Cell (for short ‘PLPC’) for
rural areas. The PLPC should be headed by District Collector
and function under his direction and supervision. The PLPC
shall get such complaints/representations enquired into by
deputing concerned Sub Divisional Officer/Tehsildar/Naib
Tehsildar so as to verify whether or not such encroachments
have actually taken place on such land. If the allegations are
found to be substantiated, appropriate steps in accordance
with law be immediately taken for removal of the
encroachments and appropriate penal action be also taken
against the trespassers. The complaints/representations
received in the PLPC should be decided by passing speaking
order, informing the respective
complainant/representationist about the action taken. This
would obviate the necessity of such complainants/
representationists approaching this Court directly by way of
public interest litigation. If this pract