##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:20522]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3/2026

Piyush Kumar Trivedi S/o Shri Vinod Kumar Trivedi, Aged About

26 Years, R/o Near Pg College, In Front Of First Tower, Police

Station Kotwali, District Dausa. (Accused Is In Judicial Custody

At Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4/2026

Subham Gurjar S/o Shri Guman Singh Gurjar, Aged About 29

Years, R/o Gram Kherwal, Tehsil Dausa, District Dausa,

Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp --Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Ketan Dhabhai, Adv.

Mr. Amit Puri, Adv.

Mr. Jai Kumar Jain, Adv.

Ms. Keerti, Adv.

Ms. Bhumika Goyal, Adv. for

Mr. Samarth Kumar Jain, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, Public

Prosecutor.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

Date of conclusion of arguments:- 12.05.2026

Date on which the judgment

was Reserved :- 12.05.2026

Whether the full judgment or only the operative part is

pronounced:- Full Judgment

[2026:RJ-JP:20522] (2 of 7) [CRLMB-3/2026]

Date of pronouncement:- 15.05.2026

1. These bail applications under Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik

Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 have been filed on behalf of the accused-

petitioners arising out of FIR No.34/2025 dated 16.07.2025

registered at Police Station SOG, Jaipur for offences under

Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B Indian Penal Code,

1860 (for short, ‘IPC’) along with Section 66-D of the Information

Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (for short, ‘IT Act’) against

the order dated 24.12.2025 passed by the Court of learned

Additional Sessions Judge No.7, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur

whereby the bail application preferred by the accused-petitioner

came to be rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the

petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is

contended that owing to matrimonial and personal disputes

between the family of petitioner- Piyush Kumar and the

complainant, the present FIR has been lodged with an oblique

motive to settle personal scores. It is further contended that

accused petitioner- Shubham Gurjar has been implicated solely on

the basis of statements of co-accused persons and no independent

incriminating material has been placed on record against him.

3. It is further submitted that petitioners had pursued their

Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (‘MBBS’) course

from Georgia and had appeared in the Foreign Medical Graduate

Examination (for short, ‘FMGE’) examination earlier, however, he

had no knowledge regarding the alleged forged nature of the

FMGE result and certificate. It is submitted that the complainant

himself had collected the relevant documents and submitted the

[2026:RJ-JP:20522] (3 of 7) [CRLMB-3/2026]

online applications and thereafter informed the petitioner that he

had qualified the examination, on the basis whereof the petitioner

applied for internship bona fide believing the documents to be

genuine.

4. It is further submitted that the petitioners have not prepared

any forged document themselves and have been falsely implicated

in the matter, the investigation stands completed and charge-

sheet has already been filed and no further custodial interrogation

of the petitioners is required. It is further contended that the

accused petitioners- Piyush Kumar and Shubham Gurjar have

been in judicial custody since 02.12.2025 and 03.12.2025

respectively and the trial is likely to take considerable time,

continued incarceration of the accused petitioners would serve no

useful purpose, particularly when they have no criminal

antecedents and there is no likelihood of absconding or tampering

with evidence, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and long

incarceration of the accused petitioners, the present bail

applications may be allowed.

5. Per