2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15336
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
SMT. KAMLA JAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 11100 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:24575]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11100/2026
Smt. Kamla Jat W/o Shri Balu Lal Jat, Aged About 41 Years,
Resident Of Jaisinghpura, Tehsil Gangrar, District Chittorgarh At
Present Kuratiya, Tehsil Gangrar, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director, Integrated
Child Development Services, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Child Development Project Officer, Integrated Child
Development Services, Gangrar, District Chittorgarh,
Rajasthan.
3. The District Collector, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Chittorgarh,
District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Patel
For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
20/05/2026
1. By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has
prayed for the following reliefs-
“(i) The Order dated 01.05.2026 (Annex.-1) may kindly be
quashed and set aside.
(ii) The State authority may be directed to continue the services
of the petitioner on the post of Anganwari Worker at Anganwari
Kendra Jainsinghpura, Gram Panchayat Budh, Gangrar, District
Chittorgarh.
(iii) The Petitioner may kindly be permitted to join back his
previous place of posting.
(iv) Any other appropriate writ, order or directions which this
Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the
Petitioner.
(v) Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner may kindly be allowed with
costs.”
(Uploaded on 20/05/2026 at 02:26:55 PM)
(Downloaded on 20/05/2026 at 08:21:43 PM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:24575] (2 of 3) [CW-11100/2026]
2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and upon
perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds that
the petitioner, who is holding the post of Anganwadi Worker at
Anganwadi Centre Jaisinghpura, Gram Panchayat Budh, Project
Gangrar, has preferred the present writ petition being aggrieved
by the order dated 01.05.2026 (Annexure-1) issued by
respondent No.2 – Child Development Project Officer, Integrated
Child Development Services, Gangrar, District Chittorgarh.
3. By the aforesaid order, respondent No.2 has terminated the
services of the petitioner on the allegation that she had sold
certain gates, windows and other articles belonging to
Government Upper Primary School, Jaisinghpura. Learned counsel
for the petitioner submits that before terminating her services,
respondent No.2 neither conducted nor held any inquiry in the
matter as contemplated under Clause 9(6) of the Circular dated
12.01.2023 issued by the Child Development Department, Jaipur,
governing the terms and conditions relating to engagement and
removal of Anganwadi Workers.
4. This Court, upon careful perusal of the Circular dated
12.01.2023 issued by the Child Development Department, Jaipur,
finds that against an order of termination, the petitioner has a
remedy of filing an appeal before the competent authority. The
said Circular further provides that till the appeal preferred by the
petitioner before the competent authority is decided, no fresh
appointment shall be made against the post of Anganwadi Worker
held by her.
5. In that view of the matter, this Court deems it just and
proper to dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to
(Uploaded on 20/05/2026 at 02:26:55 PM)
(Downloaded on 20/05/2026 at 08:21:43 PM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:24575] (3 of 3) [CW-11100/2026]
the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order of
termination dated 01.05.2026 (Annexure-1) issued by the Child
Development Project Officer, Integrated Child Development
Services, Gangrar, District Chittorgarh before the competent
authority within a period of seven days from today.
6. In case such an appeal is preferred by the petitioner, it is
expected that the competent authority/Appellate Authority shall
consider and decide the same objectively and expeditiously,
preferably within a period of thirty days from the date of f