HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
DEEPAK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR – Respondent
CW / 1149 / 2021
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:24205]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1149/2021
Deepak Kumar S/o Shri Birdichand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o
House No. 5/b/151, Kudi Bhagtasni Housing Board, District
Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Director, Zoological Survey Of India, M Hblock New
Alipur, Kolkata - 70053
2. The Officer - In - Charge, Zoological Survey Of India,
Desert Regional Center, Jhalamand, Pali Road, Jodhpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Archana Joshi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. H.R. Rawal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
19/05/2026
1. By way of filing the present writ petition under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the
following reliefs:
“That in view of the facts stated and submission made above.it is
therefore most respectfully and humbly prayed that:-
A. By an appropriate writ order or directions, respondents may be
directed to regularize the services of petitioner on the post of .safai
karamchari
B. By an appropriate writ order or directions, petitioner may be
granted the pay scale of "safai Karamchari".
C. By an appropriate writ order or direction the Impugned order dated
27.03.2019(Annexure-5) may kindly be quashed and set aside. ....”
2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon
perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds that
the petitioner was appointed as a Safai Karamchari by the
(Uploaded on 20/05/2026 at 03:30:36 PM)
(Downloaded on 20/05/2026 at 09:57:47 PM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:24205] (2 of 6) [CW-1149/2021]
respondents on 16.10.2000. Thereafter, the respondents
dispensed with the services of the petitioner on 01.12.2004,
whereupon he raised an industrial dispute. The said dispute was
referred to the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, which, vide
award dated 04.05.2012, held the action of the respondents in
terminating the services of the petitioner to be illegal and directed
his reinstatement in service with back wage upto 50%. The award
dated 04.05.2012 passed by the Labour Court-cum-Industrial
Tribunal was challenged before this Court by way of filing S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No.7848/2012. This Court, after hearing learned
counsel for the parties, modified the award only to the extent of
reducing the back wages from 50% to 25%; however, the findings
regarding reinstatement and continuity of service were
maintained.
3. It is further noticed that when the aforesaid award was not
implemented in its true letter and spirit, the petitioner again
approached this Court by way of filing S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.6895/2016 ‘Deepak Kumar v. The Director, Zoological Survey
of India’ seeking regularization of his services. The said writ
petition came to be disposed of vide order dated 16.11.2018,
whereby the respondents were directed to treat the petitioner as
continuing in service without any break and further consider his
case for regularization in the respondent organization.
4. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is
that despite having rendered service in the respondent
department for more than two decades as a Safai Karamchari, he
is being paid only a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month.
(Uploaded on 20/05/2026 at 03:30:36 PM)
(Downloaded on 20/05/2026 at 09:57:47 PM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:24205] (3 of 6) [CW-1149/2021]
5. According to the petitioner, since he has continuously and
uninterruptedly discharged duties as a Safai Karamchari and the
nature of work performed by him is perennial in nature, he is
entitled not only to wages equivalent to those payable to a Class-
IV employee in accordance with the principle of “equal pay for
equal work”, but also to consideration for regularization against an
available vacant post of Class-IV employee/Safai Karamchari.
6. This Court further finds that the respondents, in their reply,
have not disputed the fact that the petitioner has been working as
a Class-IV employee for more than two decades. However,
according to the respondents, the petitioner is not entitled either
to a regular pay scale or r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.