##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:24328]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10452/2026

Rajendra Kumar Meena S/o Shri Kadu Ram Meena, Aged About

34 Years, R/o Village-Gulbi Ka Pura, Tehsil- Wazirpur, District

Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (Presently Posted At Sub- District

Hospital, Devgarh, Rajsamand)

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principle Secretary,

Department Of Medical And Health Jaipur.

2. Director, Department Of Medical And Health, Jaipur.

3. The Mission Director, Nhm, And Joint Secretry, Medical

And Health Services, Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan,

National Health Mission Block, Jaipur.

4. Nodal Officer For Mukhyamantri Nishulk Janch Yojana

(Mnjy), Swathya Bhawan, Jaipur.

5. Chief Medical Health Officer(Cmho), Rajsamand.

6. Principle Medical Officer, Sub District Hospital , Devgarh,

Rajsamand.

7. M/s Krishna Diagnostics Limited, The Consortium Member

Of Telecommunications Consultants India Limited,

Through Its Authorized Signatory/ Proprietor, Add 243 A,

Chinchwad, Taluka Haveli, Pune 411019 C/o Principal

Medial Officer, Sub District Hospital, Devgarh, Rajsamand.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankay Choudhary

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tanuj Jain

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

19/05/2026

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel

for the respondents jointly informed that the controversy involved

in the matter has already been set to rest by the co-ordinate

(Uploaded on 19/05/2026 at 01:31:34 PM)

(Downloaded on 20/05/2026 at 10:37:15 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:24328] (2 of 4) [CW-10452/2026]

Bench of this Court at Jaipur in a batch of writ petitions led by

Manish Dotasara v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. in S.B. CWP

No.7228/2026 decided on 29.04.2026.

The order dated 29.04.2026 passed by the co-ordinate

Bench of this Court at Jaipur in the case of Manish Dotasara

(supra) is reproduced below for ready reference:

“1. These writ petitions have been filed challenging the orders of

termination of the petitioners’ services by the different Outsourcing

Agency through whom their services were taken by respondents-

Government Authorities.

2. The common facts in the present writ petitions disclosed that

the petitioners were working as Lab Technicians by indirect

contract as their services were sponsored by manpower agency.

Such a scheme was implemented in the background that the

infrastructure for lab was previously created by the Government

and only services of technicians were obtained through manpower

agency. The scheme, under which they were working, has been

modified in the format of implementation. Now the Government

has taken a decision as a policy measure that the services as well

as the infrastructure shall be handling by way of one and same and

there is no receipt of individual manpower services through

outsourcing agency as was done under the old mode of execution

of this scheme. The scheme, which was existing was now changed

into with a different name. According to the new scheme and

policy, the Government has selected a particular lab and that lab

required to offer both infrastructure services as well as the

manpower services. There is no hiring of any individual manpower

services by the Government as was done earlier. As a consequence

of change of mode of execution of the scheme, now the services of

the petitioners have been terminated by the agency under whom

the petitioners were working.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners

submitted that in the name of change of execution of the scheme,

the services of the petitioners should not have been terminated

and their services should have been continued as they were

recruited to the sanctioned post under the scheme though the

scheme was changed, but change in the mode of execution of the

scheme do not entail the Authorities to put to an end to their

services and deprive them from benefits, which are extended when

an employee works under direct or indirect contract. It is also his

submission that even if the mode of scheme is changed, the

petitione