SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15506

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
KAMLESH S/O MUKESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 5828 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:20636]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.5828/2026

Kamlesh S/o Mukesh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Onda Meena

Police Station Salempur District Dausa

(At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

15/05/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483

BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has

been arrested in connection with FIR No.307/2024, registered at

Police Station Ramnagariya, District Jaipur City (East), for the

offence(s) under Section 303(2) of BNS.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also

contended that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the

accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case

may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the

accused-petitioner may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail

application and contended that the accused-petitioner is a habitual

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 11:10:04 AM)

(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 01:03:10 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:20636] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5828/2026]

offender and against him eight cases were registered, therefore,

the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the

case. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by

the Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and

the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, this

Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner

on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is

allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Kamlesh

S/o Mukesh, in connection with FIR No.307/2024, registered at

Police Station Ramnagariya, District Jaipur City (East), shall be

enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before

the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when

called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the

address and the contact details of the surety through concerned

S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail.

7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence

on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till

conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is

directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of

the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the

accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court

every month without any delay.

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 11:10:04 AM)

(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 01:03:10 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:20636] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5828/2026]

8. The accused-petitioner is directed to submit his present

address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O.

within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall

verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the

petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit

the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the

concerned learned trial Court. In case of any breach of the

aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be

free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for

cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for

its strict compliance.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-40

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 11:10:04 AM)

(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 01:03:10 AM)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top