SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15544

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Appellant
Versus
NAVA – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JD:22721]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 448/2024

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Inspector General, Registration And Stamps Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer (Raj.).

3. Sub Registrar, Registration And Stamps Department, Chitalwana ----Petitioners Versus

1. Nava S/o Thana, Khirodi, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore.

2. Habib S/o Daadav, Umarkot, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore.

3. Vali S/o Daadav, Umarkot, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore.

4. Hajyani W/o Late Daadav, Umarkot, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Jyani for Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : -

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

12/05/2026

1. An application (IA No.01/2024) for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been moved at the behest of the appellants, it is submitted that the impugned order was passed behind the back of the appellants, without their knowledge or opportunity of hearing, and consequently, they were unaware of the passing of the said order.

2. The law of limitation is essentially a rule of d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top