SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15614

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
SITA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 8431 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:22651]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8431/2026

1. Sita Devi W/o Late Shri Sohan Lal, Aged About 61 Years,

Resident Of 15, Rajendra Nagar K No 100, Digari, Saran

Nagar, Banar Road, Jodhpur(Raj).

2. Bilkish Bano W/o Late Shri Mohammed Salim, Aged About

59 Years, Resident Of Behind Stadium Cinema, Opposite

Islamiya School, Near Mai Khadija Hospital, Udai Mandir,

Jodhpur(Raj).

3. Hamida Bano W/o Late Shri Irshad Ali, Aged About 59

Years, Resident Of Behind Rozy Cycle, Khetamandi,

Mandore Road, Jodhpur(Raj).

4. Chanduri Devi W/o Late Shri Phoja Ram, Aged About 60

Years, Resident Of Village Gujarawas, Banar Road,

Jodhpur(Raj).

5. Shanti Devi W/o Late Shri Prathvi Raj, Aged About 55

Years, Resident Of Village Gujarawas, Banar Road,

Jodhpur.(Raj).

6. Champa Devi W/o Late Shri Surja, Aged About 55 Years,

Resident Of Village Khokhariya, Sansiyon Ki Dhani, Banar

Road, Jodhpur(Raj).

7. Achalaram S/o Late Shri Jodha Ram, Aged About 55

Years, Resident Of Village Khokhariya, Sansiyon Ki Dhani,

Banar Road, Jodhpur(Raj)

----Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,

Medical And Health Services, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Director(Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Service,

Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Opposite Central Jain,

Jodhpur.

4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jodhpur Rural, District

Jodhpur.

5. Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Zone Jodhpur,

Jhalamand Circle, Jodhpur.

6. Joint Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare

Department, Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur.

(Uploaded on 12/05/2026 at 03:03:03 PM)

(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 03:54:03 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JD:22651] (2 of 5) [CW-8431/2026]

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yashpal Khileree

For Respondent(s) : --

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

12/05/2026

1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue rests

covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this

Court in Mangi Lal Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.;

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10332/2015 and other connected

matters (decided on 12.02.2024).

2. In Mangi Lal (supra), the Court observed and held as

under:

“6. The controversy before this Court is pivoted on

answer to the question, whether a Field Worker, who

did not undergo three months of training as a Health

Worker and was consequently not assigned to the

position of Health Worker but continued to work as a

Multipurpose Worker, would be entitled to the pay

scale outlined in the notification dated 06.10.1993

(Annexure-5) upon completing 10 years of service?

7. The answer is in affirmative. Reasons are not far

to seek. Foremost, reference may be had to the office

circular dated 16.07.1992 (Annexure-9) issued by the

Medical and Health Department, Government of

Rajasthan. At serial No. 15, it explicitly states that the

position of Field Worker (Male) would be redesignated

as Health Worker (Male) / Multipurpose Worker.

8. Pertinently, in the process of redesignation, no

distinction has been made between the Health Worker

(Male) and Multipurpose Worker.

(Uploaded on 12/05/2026 at 03:03:03 PM)

(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 03:54:03 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JD:22651] (3 of 5) [CW-8431/2026]

9. No doubt, an individual who has completed the

three months of training as outlined in the notification

dated 30.11.1994 (Annexure-3) would be entitled to

work in the capacity of Health Worker (Male).

10. It is undisputed that the petitioners have not

undergone the three months of training, and they

continue to serve as Multipurpose Health Workers, as

is the case even today.

11. What thus has to be seen is if the petitioners are

entitled to the benefit of the notification dated

06.10.1993 (Annexure-5). For ready reference, the

same is reproduced hereunder:-

“GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN

Finance (Gr.2) Department

NOTIFICATION

No.F.20(53)FD(Gr.2)/89-Pt.III Jaipur, dated: 6-10-

1993.

Subject:- Rajasthan Civil Services (Revised Pay Scales)

Rules, 1989.

In exercise of the powers conferred by t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top