SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15625

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
FARJAND ALI
VIMLESH TANWAR – Appellant
Versus
ABHISHEK JINDAL – Respondent
CW / 10249 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:22951]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10249/2026

Vimlesh Tanwar S/o Likhmichand Tanwar, Aged About 45 Years,

Proprietor Of M/s Maya Medical Store, 11, Shardul Colony,

Bikaner (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

Abhishek Jindal S/o Sh. Anand Kumar Jindal, R/o 11, Shardul

Colony, Tulsi Circle, Hospital Road,bikaner (Raj.).

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deelip Kawadia

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Acharya

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

12/05/2026

1. The instant writ petition has been instituted assailing the

order dated 01.09.2025 passed by the learned Rent Tribunal,

Bikaner in Case No.19/2023 as affirmed by the order dated

05.05.2026 passed learned Appellate Rent Tribunal, Bikaner in

Rent Appeal No.59/2025 whereby the petitioner-tenant has been

directed to hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the

premises in question to the respondent-landlord within a

stipulated period, and the appeal preferred against the said order

has also come to be dismissed.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone

through the orders impugned as well as settlement/compromise

placed on record.

(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 11:02:00 AM)

(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 04:05:46 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JD:22951] (2 of 3) [CW-10249/2026]

2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of

the respective parties jointly submitted before this Court that,

during the pendency of the present proceedings, the parties have

amicably resolved their inter se dispute outside the precincts of

the Court and have voluntarily arrived at a mutually acceptable

settlement governing the rights and obligations arising out of the

tenancy in question.

3. It has been jointly prayed that, in view of the settlement so

arrived at, the present writ petition be disposed of in terms

thereof. The settlement/compromise so filed is taken on record.

The terms and conditions of the settlement, as agreed upon

between the parties, are taken on record and are reproduced

hereinbelow for the sake of clarity and future reference:-

(i) The petitioner-tenant shall vacate and hand over peaceful and

vacant possession of the premises in dispute to the respondent-

landlord on or before 31.12.2027.

(ii) It has further been agreed between the parties that till the

aforesaid date of vacating the premises, there shall be no

enhancement or increase in the monthly rent and the petitioner-

tenant shall continue to pay rent at the rate of Rs.5,500/- (Rupees

Five Thousand Five Hundred only) per month regularly and

punctually.

(iii) The parties have also agreed that arrears of rent, if any, shall

be paid and satisfied in accordance with the findings and

directions contained in Issue No.1 of the judgment/order passed

by the learned Rent Tribunal, Bikaner.

(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 11:02:00 AM)

(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 04:05:46 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JD:22951] (3 of 3) [CW-10249/2026]

4. This Court has considered the submissions advanced by

learned counsel for the parties and has perused the terms of

settlement placed on record. Since the compromise appears to be

lawful, voluntary and arrived at without any coercion or undue

influence, and as the same would subserve the ends of justice

while bringing quietus to the long-standing dispute between the

parties, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present

writ petition in terms of the aforesaid settlement.

5. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of in the

aforesaid terms. The petitioner-tenant shall remain bound by the

undertaking implicit in the settlement and shall hand over peaceful

and vacant possession of the premises to the respondent-landlord

on or before 31.12.2027 without seeking any further extension of

time. Till then, he shall not be ousted from the rented premises in

pursuance of the order impugned and warrant of possession if he

remain abides by the condition enumerated therein.

5.1. It is made clear that in the event of default or breach of any

of the terms of the settlement, it shall be open f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top