HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR,
SUNIL BENIWAL
SHRAVAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
HC / 207 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:22562-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 207/2026
Shravan Kumar S/o Shri Bhera Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Dadusan Bawarla, Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Of Home
Affairs Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Barmer, Rajasthan.
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Jalore, Rajasthan.
4. The Station House Officer (Sho), Police Station Sarwana,
District Jalore, Rajasthan.
5. The Station House Officer (Sho), Police Station
Dhorimana, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
6. Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Jagdish Kumar, R/o Bharte Ki Beri,
Khari, Tehsil Dhorimana, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
7. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Virdha, R/o Bharte Ki Beri, Khari,
Tehsil Dhorimana, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
8. Bhajan Lal, R/o Bharte Ki Beri, Khari, Tehsil Dhorimana,
District Barmer, Rajasthan.
9. Bhikha Ram S/o Kana Ram, R/o Uparla Choutan, District
Barmer, Rajasthan.
10. Jagdish S/o Shri Virdha Ram, R/o Bharte Ki Beri, Khari,
Tehsil Dhorimana, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
11. Pradip S/o Shri Virdha Ram, R/o Bharte Ki Beri, Khari,
Tehsil Dhorimana, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
12. Prakash Kumar S/o Shri Bhgirath, R/o Bharte Ki Beri,
Khari, Tehsil Dhorimana, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
13. Bhanwar Lal S/o Shri Babulal, R/o Bharte Ki Beri, Khari,
Tehsil Dhorimana, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
14. Mangilal S/o Shri Bhikaram Khichad, R/o Aagor Chouthan,
District Barmer, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sourabh Soni
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG
Mr. Vijay Raj Bishnoi
Mr. Kishanlal, ASI and
Ms. Pooja Meena, FC No.672, P.S.
(Uploaded on 12/05/2026 at 02:29:28 PM)
(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 04:09:13 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:22562-DB] (2 of 3) [HC-207/2026]
Sarwana, Jalore
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL
Order
12/05/2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present habeas corpus petition has been filed by the
petitioner who claims himself to be the husband of the corpus ‘Ms.
A’ and she is stated to be in the illegal detention of the private
respondents.
3. In pursuance of the directions issued by this Court, ‘Ms. A’
was produced before us on 11.05.2026. We conferred with the
corpus and since the corpus was unable to decide judiciously and
we found that she is in some pressure, therefore, she was allowed
to stay for a night in Nari Niketan, Jodhpur.
4. Today, the corpus was again produced before us. We have
conferred with the corpus as well as the parents of the petitioner
and the corpus, who is present in the Court, and a detailed
interaction has been taken place between the two families. The
two families have resolved that the relationship of the petitioner
and corpus is acceptable provided a joint reception is held as per
the social customs.
5. The corpus has expressed the desire to either live with the
present petitioner or if the same is not acceptable to her parents,
then she would like to stay in the Nari Niketan, Jodhpur. In
whatever situation she has expressed the desire to go with the
present petitioner with whom she has solemnized marriage, we
(Uploaded on 12/05/2026 at 02:29:28 PM)
(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 04:09:13 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:22562-DB] (3 of 3) [HC-207/2026]
feel that since the corpus is 21 years of age and is holding the
qualification of B.A., B.Ed., she understands her well-being quite
well. Since the corpus is a mature person and after a detailed
interaction with her, we feel that she has expressed desire to
cohabit with the present petitioner, therefore, we dispose of this
writ petition with the liberty to the corpus to live with the
petitioner and at a place of her own choice.
6. The investigating agency is, therefore, directed to see to it
that she reaches the place of her choice safely.
7. It is made clear that if both the families wish to hold any
reception, they will be free to do it in accordance with the social
customs.
8. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.