HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Anil Kumar Upman, J
Ramkhiladi Saini – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7932/2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks service extension based on circulars despite reaching superannuation age. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. statutory rule 11 of the 2022 rules prohibits extension beyond 60 years. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. statutory provisions prevail over circulars; petition dismissed due to non-compliance with rules. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
Order
12/05/2026
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with
following prayer:-
“It is therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that
this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be
allowed and by an appropriate writ order or direction:
(A) The impugned communication dated
(Uploaded on 20/05/2026 at 01:21:14 PM)
(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 04:26:13 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:20436] (2 of 8) [CW-7932/2026]
24.01.2024 alongwith entire proceeding pursuant
thereto qua the petitioner including his impugned
verbal termination in pursuance of the impugned
order dated 24.01.2024 may kindly be directed to
treat the petitioner to be deemed to be in continuous
contractual service on the post of Jr. Technical
Assistant with the respondent and permit the
petitioner to resume his duties on the said
consequential benefits, more particularly, in the light
of Hon’ble High Court orders.
(B) The action of the respondents while not
extending the services of the petitioner upto 65 years
of age and terminating services of the petitioner on
dated 15.05.2026 despite the fact that the aspirants
of 65 years of age are being considered for
continuing on contractual appointment, may kindly be
declared per se illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the
provisions of Constitution of India and thus,
respondents may kindly be directed to not
terminating service of the petitioner on dated
15.05.2026 on account of he attains age 60 years.
(C) The respondents may kindly be directed to
extend the contractual services of the petitioner upto
65 years of age and permit him to continue his
services on the post of Jr. Technical Assistant in
Panchayat Samiti Govindgarh, District Alwar till he
attains the age of 65 years.
(D) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction
which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper
in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly
be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
initially, the petitioner was appointed to the post of Junior
Technical Assistant under the NREGA Scheme vide order dated
10.05.2008 on a contractual basis, and he joined his duties at
Panchayat Samiti Behror, Alwar. Thereafter, the petitioner was
reappointed vide letter dated 19.04.2023 under the Rajasthan
Contractual Hiring to Civil Post Rules, 2022 and in pursuance
thereto, he joined his duties at Panchayat Samiti Govindgarh on
(Uploaded on 20/05/2026 at 01:21:14 PM)
(Downloaded on 21/05/2026 at 04:26:13 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:20436] (3 of 8) [CW-7932/2026]
21.04.2023. Counsel further submits that at the time of his initial
appointment, the petitioner was 42 years of age and has rendered
contractual services in the respondent Department for a period of
about 18 years. It is further submitted that the petitioner is going
to attain the age of 60 years on 15.05.2026.
3. Learned counsel further submits that the maximum age
prescribed for a Junior Technical Assistant is 65 years and there
exists a provision for extension of services of a Junior Technical
Assistant up to the age of 65 years. Since the petitioner was going
to attain the age of 60 years, he submitted a request before the
respondent-Department seeking extension of his contractual
services on the post of Junior Technical Assistant up to the age of
65 years. However, no heed was paid by the respondent-
Department to the request made by the petitioner for extension of
his services with effect from 15.05.2026 upon his attaining the
age of 60 years.
4. Learned counsel further submits that the action of the
respondent-Department is wholly illegal and arbitrary, inasmuch
as candidates up to the maximum age of 65 years are being
considered for appointment in certain cat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.