SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18882

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
POOJA MEENA D/O BRIJ MOHAN MEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 4308 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:20974]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4308/2026

1. Pooja Meena D/o Brij Mohan Meena, Aged About 31

Years, R/o Vill. Bhoolaheri, Post Laturi, Teh. Sangod, Dis-

trict Kota, Rajasthan-325207

2. Poonama Ram S/o. Roopa Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/

o. Gomrakh Dham, Taratra Math, Teh.-Chohtan, Dist.-

Barmer, Rajasthan-344012.

3. Kamlesh D/o Lala Ram Gurjar, Aged About 41 Years, R/o

Vill. Chirawal Mali, Post Sirthala, Teh. Nagar, District

Bharatpur, Rajasthan-321205

4. Madhu Bala Tailor D/o Bhag Chand Tailor, Aged About 40

Years, R/o H. No. 13, Gyan Vihar B.k. Kaul Nagar, District

Ajmer, Rajasthan-305001

5. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About

39 Years, R/o Vill. Kasganj, Post Maloni Panwar, Teh.

Saipau, District Dholpur, Rajasthan-328023

6. Suman Kanwar D/o Kishor Singh, Aged About 34 Years,

R/o Ward No. 13, Vill. Kishanpura, District Jhunjhunu, Ra-

jasthan-333036

7. Taga Ram S/o Jala Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o. Vill.-

Shivpura, Post.- Hoteegoan, Th.- Chitalwana, Dist.-Jalore,

Rajasthan-343027.

8. Man Mohan Yadav S/o. Umrav Lal Yadav, Aged About 27

Years, R/o. Village Govari, Post. - Garh Basai, Teh.-

Thanagazi, Dist.- Alwar, Rajasthan.-301022.

9. Manisha Jangid D/o. Radhey Shyam Jangid, Aged About

38 Years, R/o. Gujer Wala Balaji Ke Pass, Vp Bhandarej,

Dist.-Dausa, Rajasthan. -303501.

----Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education De-

partment, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jan-

path, Jaipur

2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Ra-

jya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur-

302018

3. The Director, Elementary Education Rajasthan, Lalgarh

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:20974] (2 of 3) [CW-4308/2026]

Palace, Near Unnamed Road, Samta Nagar, Bikaner

334001.

4. Deepak Depawat S/o Bhawani Dan Charan, Aged About

25 Years, R/o Jain Jawahar Mandal Ke Pass Deshnok, Dis-

trict - Bikaner, State-Rajasthan - 334801.

5. Mamta Meena D/o Prahlad Meena, Aged About 32 Years,

R/o Village Ismailepura, Post Bagdi, District Tonk, State

Rajasthan - 304801

6. Ravina D/o Mahender Gorchhiya, Aged About 25 Years, R/

o Ward No.4, Vpo Dhannasar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District

Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335524.

7. Ravina D/o Mahender Gorchhiya, Aged About 25 Years, R/

o Ward No.4, Vpo Dhannasar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District

Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335524.

8. Robin Sharma S/o Shiv Kumar Sharma, Aged About 26

Years, R/o Vpo Ghamurwali, Tehsil Padampur, District Sri

Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335042.

9. Rajesh Datusala S/o Sahi Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o

Village Sirsali, Tehsil Churu, District Churu, Rajasthan-

331029

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devranjan Singh Shekhawat for

Mr. Nalin G. Narain for RSSB

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

Order

19/05/2026

1. Learned counsel appearing for both the parties jointly

submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely

covered by the judgment dated 11.05.2026 passed by this Court

in the case of Yasmeen Bee D/o Nijamuddin & ors. Vs. State

Of Rajasthan & Ors. & Ors. connected matters in S.B. CWP

No. 13045/2025, wherein following directions were given:

"17. Consequently, while allowing these writ petitions, it is

directed that the respondents shall determine correct num-

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:20974] (3 of 3) [CW-4308/2026]

ber of vacancies on the basis of guidelines given by the Di-

vision Bench of this Court as well as by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Namonarayan Sharma &

Others (supra) and after assessing the correct number of

vacancies, the respondents shall reexamine the claims of

the petitioners afresh and, in case the petitioners are other-

wise eligible in terms of the advertisement and are found to

have secured higher marks, on the basis of revised results,

than the last appointed candidate in their respective cate-

gory, the respondents shall offer appointment to the peti-

tioners, subject to availability of the vacancies, after rede-

termining their existence in accordance with the gui

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top