SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 18886

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
SURENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI BHAG CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 7262 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:20975]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7262/2026

1. Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Bhag Chand, Aged About 41

Years, R/o. Village Kamalsar, Post- Deloi South, Dist.

Jhunjhunu, Raj-331027

2. Ashish Kumar Bairwa S/o. Babu Lal Bairwa, Aged About

30 Years, R/o. Village Devpura, Post- Arniya Dedar, Teh.-

Tonk, Rajasthan.-304001.

3. Vijender Kumar S/o Parkash Chander, Aged About 31

Years, R/o Near Jakhod Road Surajgarh, Ward No. 20,

District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan-333029

4. Saurabh Sharma S/o. Mahaveer Prasad Sharma, Aged

About 26 Years, R/o. Vill. Seenta, Post. Gud-

dhanathawatan, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. 323001

5. Jai Shri D/o Shri Narpat Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o

Rajputana Street, Ward No. 10, Village Palasara, Tehsil-

Sikar, Rajasthan-332405.

6. Poonam Kumari Mahala D/o. Bhanwar Lal Mahala, Aged

About 31 Years, R/o. Vpo Narodara, Th. Laxmangarh,

Dist. Sikar, Rajasthan. 332311.

7. Chhote Lal Battar S/o Gara Ram Battar, Aged About 41

Years, R/o Vill. Pathana, Teh. Buhana, Post Pacheri Bari,

District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan-333515

8. Manish Kumar Sharma S/o. Banwari Lal, Aged About 39

Years, R/o. Vpo- Shekhsar, Th. Mandawa, Dist. Jhun-

jhunu, Rajasthan.-333010

9. Azharuddin S/o. Anwar Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o.

Grain Godam Road, Bazaria, District. Sawaimadhopur, Ra-

jasthan.322001

----Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education De-

partment, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jan-

path, Jaipur

2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Ra-

jya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur-

302018

3. The Director, Elementary Education Rajasthan, Lalgarh

Palace, Near Unnamed Road, Samta Nagar, Bikaner

334001.

4. Sunil Kumar S/o Balveer, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:20975] (2 of 3) [CW-7262/2026]

No.3, Vpo 16 Ag Bhompura, Rawatsar Hanumangarh, Dis-

tricrt Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335524.

5. Girdhari Lal Bairva S/o Rampratap Bairva, Aged About 32

Years, R/o Village Post Birasana, Tehsil Andhi, District

Jaipur, Rajasthan-303001.

6. Pankaj Katara S/o Mohan Lal Sharma, Aged About 25

Years, R/o Vpo Sirrond, Tehsil Roopwas, Dist. Bharatpur,

State Rajasthan - 321403

7. Seema Rajawat D/o Ummed Singh Rajawat, Aged About

38 Years, R/o 34 Govind Niwas Mayur Colony, Post Gula-

bpura, District Bhilwara, State-Rajasthan- 311021

8. Ravina D/o Mahender Gorchhiya, Aged About 25 Years, R/

o Ward No.4, Vpo Dhannasar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District

Hanumangarh, Rajasthan-335524.

9. Mohammed Vaseem S/o Mohammed Naeem, Aged About

28 Years, R/o Vill Bahter, Post Bahter, Teh. Malarna Dun-

gar, District Sawaimadhopur, State - Rajasthan - 322028.

10. Uday Ram Gurjar S/o Ramdhan Gurjar, Aged About 27

Years, R/o Village Ursewa, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur, Ra-

jasthan-303008.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devranjan Singh Shekhawat for

Mr. Nalin G. Narain for RSSB

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

Order

19/05/2026

1. Learned counsel appearing for both the parties jointly

submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely

covered by the judgment dated 11.05.2026 passed by this Court

in the case of Yasmeen Bee D/o Nijamuddin & ors. Vs. State

Of Rajasthan & Ors. & Ors. connected matters in S.B. CWP

No. 13045/2025, wherein following directions were given:

"17. Consequently, while allowing these writ petitions, it is

directed that the respondents shall determine correct num-

ber of vacancies on the basis of guidelines given by the Di-

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:20975] (3 of 3) [CW-7262/2026]

vision Bench of this Court as well as by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Namonarayan Sharma &

Others (supra) and after assessing the correct number of

vacancies, the respondents shall reexamine the claims of

the petitioners afresh and, in case the petitioners are other-

wise eligible in terms of the advertisement and are found to

have secured higher marks, on the basis of revised results,

than the last appointed candidate in their respective cate-

gory, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top