[2026:RJ-JP:19579]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5181/2017 Sanjay Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Nemi Chandra Agrawal, R/o Kalsada, Police Station Bayana, Distt. Bharatpur ----Claimant/Appellant Versus

1. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Registered Office-The New India Assurance Building, 87, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Fort, Mumbai Through The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Branch Nai Mandi, Bharatpur (Insurance Company)

2. Sandeep Joshi S/o Kailash Joshi, 60, Gulab Niwas, Chopasani Road, Jodhpur (Owner)

3. Babulal S/o Madanlal Sharma, R/o Surajpole Makhepura, Kota Raj. (Driver)

----Non-Claimants/Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. S.P. Poshwala, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Joshi, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Judgment

07/05/2026

1- vihykFkhZ }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj okgu nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k ¼,0Mh0ts0 la01½ c;kuk] ftyk Hkjriqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lca ksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&129@2007] lat; dqekj cuke U;w bf.M;k ba';ksjsUl dEiuh fyfeVsM o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad

18-05-2017 ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- ekeys esa fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk iwoZ esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 16-07-2009 ds }kjk vihykFkhZ dks 1]20]410@& :i;s dh vokMZ jkf'k ikfjr dh xbZ FkhA mDr vkns'k ds fo:) vihykFkhZx.k }kjk bl U;k;ky; ds le{k nhokuh fofo/k vihy la[;k&190@2010 lfa LFkr dh xbZA bl U;k;ky; }kjk mDr vihy dk fnukad 23-08-2016 dks fuLrkj.k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr iapkV fnukad 16-07-2009 dks fook|d l[a ;k 2 o 4 ds laca/k esa fudkys x;s fu"d"kZ dh lhek rd vikLr djrs gq, izLrqr fof/kd n`"VkUrksa esa fn;s x;s ekxZn'kZu ds izdk'k esa o i{kdkjksa dks lquokbZ dk volj iznku djrs gq, i=koyh mDr fook|d l[a ;k 2 o 4 ij iqu% fu.kZ; ikfjr djus gsrq fo}ku vf/kdj.k dks fjek.M dh xbZ FkhA rRi'pkr fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk fnukad 18-05-2017 dks fook|d l[a ;k 2 o 4 dh gn rd iqu% fu.kZ; ikfjr dj vihykFkhZ dks 2]87]810@& :i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k e; C;kt 6 izfr’kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c+ksrjh fd;s tkus grs q izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk gS fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dh ekfld vk; 4]000@& #i;s fu/kkZfjr dh tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh x;h gS] tcfd oDr ?kVuk vihykFkhZ ,e0ch0,0 fMxzh/kkjh FkkA nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ ds flj o vka[kksa ij xaHkhj pksVsa dkfjr gqbZ gS] ftuds lkewfgd izHkko ls mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 30 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk Hkfo"; esa gksus okyh lq[k&lqfo/kk dh deh ds en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyokbZ xbZ gS rFkk 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihMk+ dh en esa o vU; enksa esa Hkh vR;ar de jkf'k fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftuesa c+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls mijksDr rdkZsa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lafLFkr dh x;h vihy dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA

5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh o fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

6- ekeys dh nq?kZVuk esa vihykFkhZ dks dkfjr gqbZ pksVksa ds QyLo:i mlds 'kjhj ij dqy 30 izfr'kr LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gS] tSlk fd LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk izek.k i= izn'kZ&157 ds voyksdu ls Li"V gSA eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr O;fDr;ksa dks {kfriwfrZ fnyok;s tkus ds lna HkZ esa ekuuh;

mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar Anant Son of Sidheswar Dukre Vs. Pratap son of Zhampannappa Lamzane & Anr.

esa fl)kUr reported in (2018) 9 Supreme Court Cases 450, izfrikfnr fd;k gS tks fuEu izdkj ls gS %&

“12. In case of motor accidents leading to injuries and disablements, it is a well settled principle that a person must not only be compensated for his physical injury, but also for the non-pecuniary losses which he has suffered due to the injury. The claimant is entitled to be compensated for h