HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JODHP
G.P. BANAR and ANR – Appellant
Versus
CHUNA RAM and ORS – Respondent
CMA 633/2006
[CR JAKHARBY HON'BLE COUR, '', 'JAGDISH PRAJAPAT', 'BV THANVI', '', 'DY GA', 'SMT CHANDRALEKHA']
1
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.633/2006
Gram Panchayat Banar and another.
vs.
Chuna Ram and others.
Date : 28.7.2006
HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.
Mr. CR Jhakar, for the appellants.
Mr. BV Thanvi, for the respondents.
- - - - -
At the request of the learned counsel for the parties,
this appeal is heard finally and decided.
The trial court dismissed the suit of the plaintiffs on
the ground that the plaintiff did not serve the notice
under Section 109 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act before
filing the suit against the Gram Panchayat and the Sarpanch
of the Gram Panchayat as well as other government officers
for which notice under Section 80 CPC is required. The
first appellate court set aside the judgment and decree of
the trial court rejecting the plaint on the ground that the
action of the Gram Panchayat does not find place in the
First Schedule of the powers of the Gram Panchayat given in
the Panchayat Act and, therefore, where the action of the
Gram Panchayat of raising Sabha Bhawan is within their
jurisdiction or not, is the issue involved and that can be
decided in the suit.
2
It is not in dispute that during the pendency of this
litigation, the petitioners/defendants have already
constructed the building. The plaintiff also submitted
application for amendment of the plaint seeking relief of
the removal of building also. In these facts and
circumstances, it appears that the entire action of the
Gram Panchayat is under challenge. There is no reason to
not to follow the procedure prescribed for filing the suit
against the Gram Panchayat and its officers, particularly
in this case, now there remains no urgency. The plaintiff
should follow the procedure before fiing the suit against
the Gram Panchayat.
In view of the above, this appeal is allowed, the order
of the first appellate court dated 14.2.2001 is set aside
and the plaint shall stand rejected for want of notice
under Section 109 of the Panchayat Act.
However, it is made clear that the plaintiff shall have
liberty to file fresh suit after serving notice under
Section 109 of the Panchayat Act and notice under Section
80 CPC to the defendant no.4 – State of Rajasthan.
(PRAKASH TATIA), J.
S.Phophaliya