1. Challenge to re-lottery for reservation of seats in municipal elections — Alleged arbitrary action without notice. (Para 1 , 2 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J
Harish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20557/2026 | S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20725/2026 | CNR: RJHC010868792026, URN: CW / 35054U / 2026
1. Challenge to re-lottery for reservation of seats in municipal elections — Alleged arbitrary action without notice. (Para 1 , 2 )
2. Petitioners argued election process not commenced; respondents argued declaration of programme initiates process, barring court interference under Article 243-ZG. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 )
3. Writ petitions dismissed — Court declined interference due to bar under Article 243-ZG of the Constitution. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 )
Upon declaration of the election programme by the State Election Commission, the election process is initiated, triggering the bar under Article 243-ZG. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 )
Yes, the bar ousts the High Court's jurisdiction to interfere with election matters once the election process has commenced, as per the Constitution Bench decision. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 )
A decision of a larger Bench is binding on a smaller Bench; the smaller Bench cannot doubt its correctness and must follow it. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 )
Order
21/08/2026 Reportable
1. Since a common question of law and facts is involved in all these writ petitions, which pertain to the lottery process initiated by the respondents for the purpose of reservation of seats in the forthcoming Rajasthan Municipal Elections, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the arguments in both the writ petitions were heard together and the same are being decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts relating to S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20557/2026 are being taken
(D.B. SAW/972/2026 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(D(Uowplnolaodaedde do no n2 22/60/80/82/022062 6a ta 0t 10:43:64:65:93 6P PMM))
[2026:RJ-JD:41599] (3 of 11) [CW-20557/2026] into consideration, which has been preferred with the following
prayer:
"It is therefore most humbly prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed :
a) That by an Order, Writ or Direction may kindly be issued for quashing and setting aside the impugned Letter dated 17.08.2026 and relevant part of the draw of re-lottery (Annexure-9) Colly. Issued by the District Election Officer cum District Collector, Jalore. b) That by an Order, Writ or Direction may kindly be issued for quashing and setting aside the impugned Letter dated 17.08.2026 (Annexure-10) as issued by the District Election Officer cum District Collector,
Jalore.
c) Any other Order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper may also be granted in
favour of the petitioner."
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that, as per the provisions contained in the Rajasthan Municipalities Election Rules, a list was prepared and lotteries were drawn for the purpose of category-wise reservation of seats in the municipalities. Learned counsel submits that, all of a sudden, without any notice to the petitioners, a fresh exercise was
undertaken and the earlier order was changed.
3. It is further submitted that now the reservation policy has not been applied in proportion to the population, as per the census of the concerned area. Hence, there is no justification for such unequal distribution of reservation amongst the municipalities. Learned counsel submits that, till date, the election process has not been initiated and only a Model Code of Conduct has been issued by way of a press note. It is, therefore, submitted that this Court can interfer with the impugned arbitrary action of the
respondents.
4. Learned counsel submits that unless and until a notification is issued by the State Election Commission, it cannot be presumed
(D.B. SAW/972/2026 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders)
(D(Uowplnolaodaedde do no n2 22/60/80/82/022062 6a ta 0t 10:43:64:65:93 6P PMM))
[2026:RJ-JD:41599] (4 of 11) [CW-20557/2026] that the election process has commenced so as to bar the judicial interference. Hence, in the facts and circumstances of the case, it is contended that this Court would be justified in exercising its jurisdiction and interfering with the impugned action of the
respondent.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that, in terms of Rule 10 of the relevant Election Rules, the election process commences from the date of issuance of the notification
and not from the date of declaration of the election programme.
6. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State opposes the prayer and taken a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the petition, in terms of the mandate contained under Article 243-ZG of the Constitution of India. He submits that after initiation of the election process, this Court has
no jurisdiction to interfere with the election process.
7. Learned counsel submits that the Rajasthan State Election Commission, Rajasthan, has already declared the election programme vide order dated 19.08.2026 for conducting municipal elections in 309 different municipalities of the State of Rajasthan. It is submitted that the declaration of the dat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.