Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 34253
[2026:RJ-JD:53587-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 449/2026 CNR: RJHC010801392026 | URN: WMAP / 917U / 2026
Asharam Alias Ashumal S/o Late Shri Thevardas Alias Thaumal, Aged About 87 Years, At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur R/o Sant Shri Asharamji Asharam, Motera Ahmedabad, Gujrat380005 .----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Of Home Department Jaipur Raj.
2. The Director General, Jail, Jaipur.
3. The District Collector, Jodhpur.
4. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Jodhpur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Chandak for Mr. B.L. Bhati, AAG.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J (DR. NUPUR BHATI),J
Crt_10 (2096)S-A/2 Mithil/Devesh
Order
30/10/2026
1. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that a compliance report has been placed on record today along with the Office Order dated 28.10.2026, which reveals that pursuant to the order dated 03.10.2026, the applicant was released on parole on 08.10.2026 for a period of twenty days, which came to an end at 5:00 p.m. on 27.10.2026, however, instead of surrendering on the stipulated date, the applicant surrendered on 28.10.2026. He further submits that the present misc. application was preferred seeking compliance with the order dated 03.08.2026 passed by this Court, whereby the applicant was directed to be released on parole for a period of twenty days. He submits that since the applicant has already been released on parole for the aforesaid period and has thereafter surrendered, the directions issued by this Court stand substantially complied with and consequently, nothing further survives for consideration in the present application, which has become infructuous.
2. This Court has considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent-State and perused the compliance report along with the Office Order dated 28.10.2026, which establishes that the applicant was, in fact, released on parole on 08.10.2026 for the stipulated period of twenty days in compliance with the order dated 03.08.2026 passed by the Court. The fact that the applicant surrendered on 28.10.2026, instead of 27.10.2026, does not detract from the fact that the benefit of parole for the period directed by this Court has already been extended to him. In these circumstances, this Court is satisfied that the directions contained in the order dated 03.08.2026 have been substantially complied with and no further directions are warranted in the present misc. application.
3. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, no further adjudication is called for in the present matter. Accordingly, the present miscellaneous application is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
4. The compliance report dated 28.10.2026 is taken on record.
