SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(RCT) 715

RAILWAY CLAIM TRIBUNAL - BHUBNESHWAR
PUSPA BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
GM/ECOR – Respondent
OA (II u)/BBS/103/2024



Page 1 of 12 oA (ilu)/ 10312024 {i BEF9RE rHE RATLWAY CtAlMq TRIBUNAL ii I i ill BHUBANESWAR BENCH i Cose No.OA (llu)/ 103/2024 Corofn: Sri Prosonto Kumor Sohu, Member (Technicol),RCT/Ronchi ot RCT/BBS Dote of incident: Ai6/T712023 '

Dote of Registrotion: 05/07/2024 Dote of Judgment: 21 /03/2025 I Cloim Amount: Rs.1 0,00,000/-

I I l ln the motter of L I tI t . ' 1. Smt.Puspo Beherq oged obout 44 yeors Appticonts W/o lote Deboroi Behero {il, 2. Bisikeson Behero oged oboul 2l yeors S/o lote Deboroi Behero

3.Sudorson Beherq oged qbout I9 yeors S/o lote Deboroi Behero

4.[olito Mohon Behero oged qbout l7 yeors S/o lote Deboroi Behero .t.

5.Arolo Behero oged qbout 8O yeors

1l liI S/o lote Sukurio Behero lt lil' All ore resident of villoge : Koiboroto Street, Holodiopodor, PS: Golonthqro, fin, Distt: Goniom, Odisho Versus Union of lndio represented through Respondenl It's Generol Monoger, Eost Coost Roilwoy;

Bhuboneswor Appeo,ronce:

li :

For the oppl[conts Sri D.K.Podhi, Advocote I :

I For the.respondent Sri K.C.Mohopotro, Ld. Stonding Counsel Ji itl rqb i[ldi irl Page 2 of 12 oA (llu)/ 10312024 JUDGEMENT ri ;il lil 1. This cloim o1 ppticorion hos been filed by the Appliconts (wife, children ond il, fother of the deceosed) under section l6 of the Roilwoy Cloims Tribunol Act, I

1987, cloiming compensotion of Rs.lOrO0,O00/- (Rupees ten Lokhs) from the Respondent Roilwoy Administrotion on occount of deoth of Deboroi Behero son of Aroto Behero, ollegedly in on Untoword lncident involving foll from running troin. 2.Brief focts gf the c,ose: As per origihol cloim petition, the deceosed Deboroi I'

Behero wos o lobourer. On06/07/2023 eorly morning he olong with one Sunil lt Behero come to Berhompur roilwoy stotion, purchosed their respective iourney i tickets from Berhompur to Bhuboneswor roilwoy stotion ond boorded Poloso- t,,, Cuttock possenger troin. lt is pleoded thot the comportment of the soid troin wos crowded ond.while the deceosed tried to go to toilet, due to push ond pull of ffit possenger, ierk of the troin, the deceosed occidentolly fell down from the running troin ond sustoined iniuries on his person. With the help of roilwoy stoff, the iniur.ed wos shifted to MKCG Hospitol Berhompur by 108 ombulonce where doctor declored him deod. With regord to iourneyticketi it is stote*lhorthsdeceosed ond his' co-possenger hod purchosed their respective iourney tickets f rom Berhompur to Bhuboneswor roilwoy stotion but the soid tickets were lost during il Il the untoword incident il l1 3. Respondenl's Reply: On receipt of notice, the.Respondent filed its wriiten lt reply to the cloim petition olong with stotuto.y DRM's investigoiion report. lt is stoted thot the on duty trciin guord of troin no.08534 Poloso-Cuttock Memu ffii possenger hove no informotion obout the olleged incident ond os per stotement of Smt.Puspo Behero, the deceosed left home ot obout 06.00 hours to trovel 6 KM by rood to cotch troin ot Berhompur roilwoy stotion but the olleged troin hod deported from Berhompur roilwoy stotion ot obout 06.05 hours; henc;-ili; pleoding of the Appliconts thot deceosed died out of foll from the soid possenger troin wos not possible. lt is further olleged thot the deceosed wos not o bono fide possenger ond during inquest no ticket or ony trovelling outhority wos recovered in possession with the deceosed. As per DRM's investigotion report, there is no i [(t[;--

I Jili oA (llu)/ 103/2024 Page 3 of. 12 direct witness to the olleged incident ond there is no evidence on record to show thot deceose.d trovelled by troin no.08534 ond died out of foll from it. lt is further olleged thot the deoth could be or1 occount of run over or ony other suspicious reoson other thon foll from the olleged troin. With these focts ond circumstonces, the Respondent Roilwoy hove sought for dismissol of the cloim petition.

4. Appliconl'g Evidence: To substontiote the pleoding mode in the cloim petition, the Appliconts hove filed the police ottested copies of FlR, lnquest Report, deod

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top