SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RCT) 692

RAILWAY CLAIM TRIBUNAL - BHUBNESHWAR
CHANDRA KANTA DIGAL AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
GM ECOR – Respondent
OA (II u)/BBS/193/2019



BHUBANESWAR BE.NCH Case No. OA (llu)/19312019 coram: Hon,bte Sri virendra Kumar Goyat, Member (Judiciat), RcT/BBS Hon,bte Sri Ajoy Kumar Behera, Member (Technicat), RcT/BBS)

Date of incident: 15/0912019 Date of Registration:. 77 117/7019 Date of Judgment: 0510617024 Cl.aim Amount: Rs. 8,00,000/-

ln the matter of years

1. CHANDRA KANTA DIGAL, aged about 35 Appticants S/o. Late Nanda Digal Z. SWARNA PMBHA DIGAL, aged about 26 years, D/o. Late Nanda Digat Both are residence of At: Swarnapatti, Ptot No. 1622, Lane-5, near Biju Pattnaik Cottege, Jayadev Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Distt: Khurdha, Odisha'

- Versus -

through Union of lndia represented Respondent It's GENEML MANAGER, EAST COAST MILWAY Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha'

Appearance:

:

For the AppLicants Sri B. Beura, Advocate For the Respondent : smt. P. Pattnaik, Ld. Addt. Standing counset.

JUDGEMENT

1. This present cl.aim apptication has been fited by the Appticants (son & daughter of the deceased) under section 16 of the Raitway Ctaims Tribunat Act, 1987, ctaiming compensation of Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs) al.ong with 9% interest from the date of fil,ing from Raitway Administration for death of their mother namety Matati Digat, W/o. Late Nanda Digat, aLtegedty in an Untoward lncident invotving fatl from a running train.

r. \

Z, Brief fFcts of the,case: - According to the originat ctaim apptication on the date of incident i.e. on 15t}gt2o1g, the deceased Mal,ati Digat was travetting atong with one of her retatives namely Matati Sethy from Cuttack to Bhubaneswar Raitway Station by Rourkela-puri passenger train on the strength of one joint llnd ctass ordinary journey tickets. lt is averred that during course of journey on the way near Bamikhal over bridge, Bhubaneswar, the deceased accidentatty fett down from the running train, sustained injuries on her person and died on the spot. ln this connection, based upon the memo of SS/Bhubaneswar Raitway Station, the GRPS/Bhubaneswar, has registered a UD case No. 7612019 and took up investigation into the matter. With regard to ticket it is submitted that on the date of incident their deceased mother was travetting on the strength of one val,id journey ticket bearing No. UYB-23828854 dated 1510917019 from Cuttack to Bhubaneswar raitway station for 2 adutts'

3. Respondent's !,eplv: - On receipt of notice, the Respondent Raitway appeared and fited its written statement to the originat ctaim application atong with DRM's statutory investigation report. ln repty, the Respondent Raitway have strongty denied the attegations of the Appticants made in the original, ctaim apptication and have hetd that it is a fatse and fabricated case. lt is stated that the atteged incident does not come under the definition of untoward incident under Section 123(CX2) and 124-A of the Raitways Act, 1989. lt is submitted that as per statement of on duty train Guard of ROU- PUI passenger, the said train passed through MCS at about 21.5? hours and reached Bhubaneswar at about 22.02 hours without any detention or jerk but as per statement of Matati Sethy (co-passenger with the deceased as per OA) the incident had occurred in between 09.OO to 10.00 hours, which cLearty establ.ished that the deceased had never travelted with the co-passenger. lt is submitted that there was no eye witness to the atteged accidentat fatting down of the deceased from the train and during inquest no journey ticket or any travetting authority was found with the deceased, hence the deceased was not a bona fide passenger. Under the above observations, the Respondent Rail.way has prayed for dismissat of the ctaim apptication and that no compensation shoutd be granted to the Appticants.

4. Applicant,s Evidence: - ln the evidence the AW 1 i.e. Appticant No. 1, Chandra Kant Digat, son of the deceased, has fited his own examination in chief on affidavit atong with attested copies of FlR, memo of SS/Bhubaneswar, inquest report, dead body chattan, final report and post mortem report. He was cross exa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top