SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(RCT) 667

RAILWAY CLAIM TRIBUNAL - LUCKNOW
HANSHRAJ RAM – Appellant
Versus
GM – Respondent


रेल दावा अधिकरण लखनऊ न्यायपीठ RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH Claim Application No.: OA/II/U/LKO/154/2016 CORAM:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bachchoo Lal, Member (Judicial).

Date of Institution: 01.02.2016 Date of Decision: 18.02.2026 Hansraj Ram, aged about 55 years, S/O Late Sri Haribhajan Ram R/o- Village- Chakarda, Post- Belaur, PS - Udabtnagar District- Bhojpur (Bihar).

……. APPLICANT VERSUS Union of India through General Manager, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi.

……. RESPONDENT Appearance: None for the applicants Mr. B. Singh, counsel for the respondent.

CLAIM FOR Rs. 6,00,000.00/- (with interest)

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bachchoo Lal, Member (Judicial)

The Learned counsel for the applicant was absent during the course of arguments. However, the Ld. Counsel for the respondent has prayed for arguments as this case is old pertaining to the year 2016. In this context, Rule 18 (1) of Railway Claims Tribunal Rules, 1989 is reproduced as under:

“18. Action on application for applicant’s default-

(1) Where on the date fixed for hearing of the application or on any other date to which such hearing may be adjourned, the applicant does not appear [When the application is called] for h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top