REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY MAHARASHTRA
Abhishek Sukhadia anr – Appellant
Versus
Ms Pragatej Builders Developers P Ltd – Respondent
Appeals-ATOO6OOOOOO0s33l7 & AT006000000093905 BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA R.EAL ESTATE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI APPEAL NO. AT0005000000053317 0F 2021 IN coMPLATNT NO,CC006000000195842 0F 2021 Sukhadia (1) Abhishek Anuj l Sukhadia (2) Chhaya Anuj l having address al C-2162, Textils Society, l Marg, Bombay Dyeing Lane, Off. VS. l
025.
l ,.,Appellants Prabhadevi, l4umbai-400 -vs-
M/s Pragatej Builders l Ltd'
Developers Pvt. I having address at A1202, K.K. Towers, l Parel, G.D. Ambedkar lYarg, l
012.
l ..,Respondent Mumbai- 400 WITH AppEAL NO, AT0006000000093905 0F 2022 IN coMPLATNT NO.CC006000000195842 0F 2021 M/s Pragatei Builders l Ltd. l Developers Pvt, having address at Flat No.B, First Floor, l Plot No.185, lagdish Building, 15th floor, l
071.
...Appellant Chembur (E), [4umbai-400 ]
-VS.-
(1) Abhishek Anuj Sukhadia l (2) Chhaya Anuj Sukhadia l having address al C-2162, Textila Society, l Bombay Dyeing Lane, Off. VS, lYarg, l Prabhadevi, Mumbai-400 025. l ...Respondents Appeals-AT005000000053317 & AT006000000093905 Adv. Mr Faran Khan for Appellants in Appeal No.AT-53317 and for Respo n de nts i n Appea I No. AT- 93 9 05.
Adu. Mr. Vishal Gaikwad for Respondents in Appeal No'AT-53317 and for Appellant in AppeaI No.93905.
CORAM : SHRIRAM R. JAGTAP, MEMBER (J) &
S.S. SANDHU, MEMBER (A)
DATE : 7th February,2023.
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCTNG)
JUDGMENT (J.)]
[PER : SHRIRAM R. JAGTAP, MEMBER Captioned Appeals emanate from order daled 27'7.2021 passed by the learned Chairperson, MahaRERA (for short'Authority), whereby the learned Authority has awarded interest to allottees from t.L.2020 till handing over possession of the subject apaftment.
For the sake of convenience parties to the appeals hereinafter will be referred to as allottees and promoter. Since both appeals are arising out of same order and pafties are same, therefore, both appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment.
27 Brief facts necessary for deciding the appeals are that, allottees have purchased apartment bearing No.901 in the project of promoter known as "Vishnuchandra Sky", situated at Wadala, Mumbai for a total consideration of Rs.2,02,40,000/- and they have paid a sum of Rs.1,59,40,000/- to promoter. This is a slum rehabilitation project.
Appeals-AT006OO00O0053317 & ATO06000O00093905 This project consists of rehab component and sale component. An agreement for sale came to be executed by and between allottees and the promoter on 22.3.2014, whereby the promoter committed to hand over possession of the subject flat to allottees by December 2015 with grace period of 6 months. The promoter has also allotted two car parking spaces on podlum/under stilt of the building.
3l Since the promoter had failed to deliver possession of the subject apartment to allottees in accordance with the terms of the agreement for sale, allottees had filed complaint bearing No.CC006000000 023778 of 2018 and had sought reliefs of interest on account of delayed possession and directions to the promoter to hand over possession of the subject flat to allottees at the earliest.
order dated 4.7.2018 is reproduced as under-
Appeals-AToo6OoooOOO53317 & AT0060oo000093905 "3.The complainants submitted that at this stage, they are interested in having the proiect completed and will therefore not insist that the Respondent pay them interest for the delayed possession as on date, provided, the Respondent completes the project by committing to a reasonable timeline. Fufthe, they submitted that if they do
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.