SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RERA) 1652

REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY MAHARASHTRA
Amerneny V Rao – Appellant
Versus
Runwal Construction – Respondent



BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL M UM BAI Appeal No. AT0060000000537 46 I 22 Baiskar Mrudula ...Appellant v/s.

Runwal Construction ... Respondent with

10) M,A. No. 135/23 (Int. Retief)

Appeal No. AT0060000000537 49 I 22 Gurshani Bindya ...Appellant v/s, Runwal Construction ... Respondent with

11) M.A. No. 136/23 (rnt. Retief)

Appea! No. AT0060000000537 22 SO I Nichani Chanda N, ...Appellant V/s.

Construction Runwal ...Respondent with

12) Appeal No. AT0060000000537SZl 22 V.

Subramanian C. ...Appellant hfl V/s.

Runwal Construction ... Respondent with Appea! No. AT0060000000537 Sg I Zz Varghses Philipose Gee ...Appellant v/s.

Runwal Construction .Respondent with

14) M.A. No. 138/23 (Int. Retief)

Appeal No. AT006000000053755 22 I Squeira Leslie ...Appellant v/s, Runwal Construction .,. Respondent with

15) M.A. No. 139/23 (Int. Relief)

Appeal No. AT0050000000537 56 I 22 Moorkoth Minish ...Appellant V/s.

Runwal Construction ... Respondent with

16) M.A. No. 140/23 (rnt. Retief)

Appeal No. AT0060000000537 57 I 22 Shetty Sunil Ramkrishna ...Appellant V/s.

Runwal Construction ... Respondent with

17) M.A. No. t4Ll23 (Int. Relief)

Appeal No. AT0060000000537 60 I 22 Kulkarni Nilesh ...Appellant V/s.

Runwal Construction ... Respondent with Appeal No. AT0060000O005376L I 22 Nair N.P. Kailasnath ...Appellant V/s.

Runwal Construction ...Respondent with

19) Appeal No. AT0060000000s37 62l 22 Balasubramanian Karthik ...Appellant v/s.

Runwal Construction ...Respondent with

2O) Appeal No. AT006000000053765 22 I Gopinath Girish ...Appellant V/s.

Runwal Construction ...Respondent with

21) M.A. No. L43lZ3 (Int. Retief)

Appeal No. AT006000000053769 I 22 Kale Vasudev ...Appellant v/s.

Runwal Construction ...Respondent with

22) M.A.No.t44l23 (rnt. Retief)

Appeal No. AT0060000000537 69 I 22 Nayak Umesh B. ...Appellant V/s.

Runwal Construction ...Respondent with Appeal No. AT006000000053770 22 I Sundar Jayesh ...Appellant Yls.

Runwal Construction ...Respondent with

24) Appeal No. AT00600000005377t 22 I Bajpai Shruti ...Appellant V/s.

Runwal Construction ... Respondent with

25) Appeal No. AT0060000000537721 22 Pramanik Sukumar ...Appellant Yls.

Runwal Construction ... Respondent with

26) M.A. No. t46l23 (rnt. Retief)

Appeal No. AT006000000053773 22 I Mehta Devang M. ...Appellant Yls.

Construction Runwal ...Respondent with

27) M.A.No.!47123 (Int.

Retief)

Appeal No. AT00600000005377 4 I 22 Pinto Henry ...Appellant V/s.

Runwal Construction ...Respondent with Appeal No. AT006000000053775 I Zz Hegde Suresh ...Appellant V/s.

Runwal Construction ... Respondent with

29) M.A. No. L49123 (Int. Relief)

Appeal No. AT00G00000005371 6 I 22 Rao Amerneny V.

...Appellant Yls.

Runwal Construction ... Respondent Adu Anjani Kumar Singh for Appe/lant in all matters Adu. Abir Pate/ for Respondent in all maffers :

CORAM SHRI SHRIRAM R. JAGTAP, MEMBER (J), &

SHRI SHRIKANT M. DESHPANDE, MEMBER (A)

DATE :

29th November,2O24 (THROUGH VrDEO CONFERENCE)

1. Record reveals that the respondent has filed affidavit mentioning therein that the name of respondent has been changed and there is order of NCLT. To counter this affidavit the appellants in following Appeal Nos. AT006-537 50 I 22, AT006-53753 122, AT006-537 56 122, 4T006-53757 122, Nt006-53762/22, AT006_53765/22, AT006_

537 69 I 22, AT006-53773 I 22, AT006-5377 U 22 have fited cou nter reply and served the copies of the same to other side.

2. Adv. Anil Kumar singh seeks time to fire counter affidavit/repry to affidavit filed by respondent in rest of the matters.

3'

\# Record reveals that in all the matters pleadings are complete. Even the pafties have filed written submissions, Therefore, the parties are directed to argue the matter flnally. If the appellants in rest of the matters want to file counter affidavit with regard to the affidavit filed by respondent they are at liberty to file the same.

4. Adv. Abir Patel seeks liberty to file rejoinder to the reply/counter affidavit filed by appellants contending that the appellants have made bald allegations against the re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top