BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE AppELLATE TRTBUNaT- uMiAr M

32) M.A. No.9B7l24 (Stay)

Aopeat No.ATr25/4 zj ZoZS M/s. Bhagwati Developers '.

Versus APPellant Mr. Amrish pramod Singh Respondent

33) M+ No. 988/241stay)

Aopeal No. ATt25/4 S t ZOZS M/s. Bhagwati Developers

versus APPellant

Mr. Krishan Kumpawat & 3 Ors.

s+l M]A.

r,lo . sB6| 24(;,rr)*"trono.r, No' ATt25 I ⁴⁴¹ 2025 M/s. Bhagwati oevetoperlppeal Versus Appellant Dr. Anupriya premraj Mohokar & Anr.

Respondent 124(stay)

-3s)M.A.960 No' AToo6oobo oo34ss26l24 M/s. Bhagwati oevetopertppeal Appellant VerSUs Mr. Shivaji Bhimaji Chaudhary & Anr.

Respondent

36) MA 9s9/24 (stay)

appeal No' 4T00600oooo345s27 /24 M/s BhagwatiDeveropers Appellant Versus Mr. Indarjit Singh pradyumansinh Chauhan & Anr.

Respondent

37)M.A. No.958/ 24(stay)

No' AToo6odoodi)34ss32124 M/s Bhagwati oeveroperlppeal Appellant Versus Mr. Subhojit Chalterjee & Anr.

Respondent

38)M.A. No.9 57 | z4(Stay)

Aopeat No.AT00600odOo3a s533124 M/s Bhagwati Developers Appellant Versus shivaji Chaudhary

1l 11":1.u.!,ta

9,,, 39) M.A. No.956/ 24(Stav)

I No' AT006ootrboos+s M/s Bhagwati o"uurflJr.e" s34 | ²⁴ Versus APPellant Mrs. Deepanwita Ghosh & Anr Respondent

40)M.A.No. g5S t 24, [42) M.A. No.96tl24 (Stav)] Appeat No. AT00Gooiroorii

4ss35124 M/s. Bhagwati Developers Appellant Versus Mr. Ganesh Vithalrao Londhe & Anr Respondent

41) M.A. No.9S4l24 (Stavt Appeat No.AT00600riooO5css36l24 r"r7s. unagwati Developers Appellant Versus Mrs. Kavita Jaikrina panda & Anr.

Respondent

Appeat No. AT0060'OOO,b03455s3/24

M/s. Bhagwati Developers Appellant Versus Mr. Muddu Satya Shriniwas Respondent

43) M.A. No.875124 (stay)

Appeat No. ATOO6OOOOO o34s6OLl24 r"r7s. unagwati Developers Appellant Versus Mrs, Deepanwita Ghosh & Anr Respondent

44) M.A. No.926124 (Stav)

AppeaI no.erOooobootiit

3456t8124 M/s. Bhagwati Developers Appellant VerSuS Mr. Ganesh Vithalrao Londhe & Anr.

Respondent

45)M.A.No. 927 t24 (Stav)

Appeat

rrro. aroOOOOodrio34s620124 rvrls. uhagwati Developers Appellant Versus Mrs. Suchita Shivaji Chaudhary & Anr.

Respondent

46)M.A. No.968/ 24(Stav)

Appeat No. AToo60ooodri 34s627124 r"r7s. unagwati Developers Appellant VeTSUS g-/

Adu. Arun Panickar forAppe//ant Adu. Nirav Shroff forRespondents :

CORAM SHRI S.S.SHINDE J.,CHAIRPERSON, &

SHRI S.M.DESHPANDE, MEMBER (A)

DATE :

20th February,2C.25 (THROUGH VrDEO CONFERENCE)

1. Adv. Nirav Shroff, Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents, in all appeals, prays 12 weeks time so as to enable respondents to fire apprications for directions to the appellant to put the respondents in possessron of the sublect flat.

2. Time granted as prayed for.

3.

The copies of such applications be served upon Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant in advance. In case such applications are filed within one week from today, we grant one week time from the receipt of the copies of the applications by the Advocate for the Appellants, for filing reply of the applicants to the said apptications fited by respective respondents.

4.

Needless to observe that respondents as well as appellants shall place on record the chart in tabular form mentioning there in amount given, received outstanding etc, Such chart in tabular form shall not contain more than three pages.

5.

List on 13.3,2025 for filing applications and reply of calculation /r chart by both parties.

h+l-(

DESHPANDE) (s.s.sHrNDE, J.) Snd