2023 Supreme(Online)(RERA) 1721
REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY MAHARASHTRA
Brijesh Kumar Mathur – Appellant
Versus
Man Golobal Ltd – Respondent
67 \o13 &'l4 to 16) A1 00600000002 I 326 BEFORE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
671 MIsC. APPLICATIoN NO. 112 OF 2023(Amendment)
Ex. NO. 40 of 2022 IN APPEAL NO. AT006000000021326 0F 2019 Anr.
Anthony D'souza & ... Applicants -vs-
Man Golobal Ltd. ...Non-applicant Alongwith
681 MISC. APPLICATION NO. 113 OF 2023(Amendment)
EX. NO. 41 of 2022 IN APPEAL NO. AT00600000002L2s7 0F 20L9 Flathur ... Applicant Brijesh Kumar -vs-
Ltd, Man Golobal . '.Non-a Pplicant Alongwith
691 MISC. APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 2o23(Amendment)
EX. NO. 42 of 2022 IN APPEAL NO. AT00600000002 t273 0F 20L9 Anr, Mrs, Simin Asif & '.. APplicants -vs-
Ltd.
Man Golobal " 'Non-applicant Alongwith
7OI MISC. APPLICATION NO, 11s OF 2023(Amendment)
EX. NO. 43 of 2022 N APPEAL NO. AT006000000021279 0F 20L9 Anr Meenal parab & ... Applicants -vs Ltd.
Man Golobal ...Non-applicant Alongwith
7U MISC. APPLICATION NO. 116 OF 2023(Amendment)
EX. NO. 44 0f 2022 N APPEAL NO. AT006000000021286 0F 2019 Anr Mr. Vikas Khanna & ,., Applicants -vs-
Ltd, N4an Golobal ...Non-applicant Alongwith
721 MISC. APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2023(Amendment)
EX. NO. 45 0f 2022 IN APPEAL NO. AT00600000003t743 0F zol9 f4ankar Mr. Sidiqali ..' Applicants -vs-
Ltd.
Man Golobal ...Non-applicant Alongwith
741 MISC. APPLICATION NO. 154 OF 2o23(Amendment)
EX. NO. 47 of 2022 IN aPPEAL NO. AT006000000021300 0F 2019 Anr. ."
Mr. Rakesh H. Parmar & Applicants -v5-
Ltd.
Man Golobal .. 'Non-applicant Alongwith
751 MISC. APPLICATION NO. 155 OF 2023(Amendment)
EX. NO, 48 of 2022 IN APPEAL NO. AT006000000021306 0F 2019 Anr.
I4r. Amit Bimani & ... Applicants -vs-
lvlan Golobal Ltd. ... Non-a pplicant Alongwith
761 MISC. APPLICATION NO. 156 OF 2023(Amendment)
EX. NO. 49 of 2022 IN APPEAL NO. AT006000000021315 0F 2019 Anr, Rakesh Kumar Jha & ... Applicants -vs-
Man Golobal Ltd. ... Non-a pplrcant Adu Rupali Padgulekar for Applicants in 5r No. 67 to 72 and St No. 74 to
76.
Adv. Wnod Talqa for Non-applicants in SL No. 67 to 72 and Sr No. 74 to
76.
CORAM : SHRI SHRIRAM. R. JAGTAP, MEMBER (J) &
DR. K. SHIVAJI, MEMBER (A)
DATE : 27th IULY, 2023 (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
Adv. Rupali Padgulekar, learned counsel for the Applicants and Adv. Vinod Talreja, learned counsel for Non-applicants joined the conference.
2l Heard learned counsel for the parttes. By these Applicataons, Applicants are seeking to m an amendment to the execution applications already flled and dfunder execution at diflerent stages including issuance of warrants for recovery of the amount as per, the common impugned order dated 10th June, 2022.
3l Learned counsel for the Applicants further submits that there was certain calculation mistake, which crept in filing the earlier Execution applications in terms of quantifying the amount of dues as per the impugned order more particularly as per the order in para 32 (3) wherein it has been speciflcally directed as " Respondent Promoter is directed to pay Appellants Allottees interest above the highest MCLR of the state Bank of India @2o/o
as directed':
This error happened inadvertently, is a bona flde mistake and seeks rectifications of this error by these amendment applications and, [Applications are allowed.] intended to correct by rectlfying of thls error and urged that these applications are allowed in the interest of justice.
4l Learned counsel for the Non-applicant, Adv. Vinod Talreja vehemently opposed by submitting that in Sr. No.67 t0 72, tecovery warrants have already been issued and are in the stage of atlachments. Therefore, this amendment of the application will lead to further complications including that the 2 different amounts