Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(RERA) 890
REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY
A.SANTHOSH REDDY, J, P.PRADEEP KUMAR REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER, CHITRA RAMCHANDRAN, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Amacon Developers – Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Kumar – Respondent
A.R.No.3/2026 against order in Complaint no.118/2024
Important Points
Subject
Real Estate - Regulatory Compliance
Act Referred
Headnote
Issues: Whether the appeal can be entertained without compliance of the mandatory deposit under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Legal Category Hierarchy
-
practice and procedure
-
appellate procedure
- statutory compliance
- dismissal for default
-
appellate procedure
-
administrative law
-
regulatory authorities
- real estate regulation
-
regulatory authorities
Order:
01). This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the order dt.16.10.2025 in Complaint No.118/2024 passed by TG RERA, praying for the following reliefs:
“... Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to set aside the orders dt.16-10-2025 in Complaint no.118/2024 passed by Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority consequently dismiss the complaint bearing no.118/2024 as it is not maintainable under the provisions of the Real Estate Regulation Act, 2016 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal deem fit or proper in the interest of justice.”
02). Today none appeared for the appellant.
03). This case was posted for compliance of Section 43(5) by the appellant, on 28.1.2026, 9.2.2026, 16.2.2026. On 2.3.2026 this Tribunal directed the appellant to comply Sec.43(5) of Real Estate (Regulation And Development) Act, 2016, and posted the case to today conditionally stating that on failure to comply the said Section, the appeal will be rejected.
04). Since there is no representation for the appellant and for non compliance of mandate laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in M/s.Newtech Promoters and Developers Put. Ltd. vs. State of UP & Ors., 2021 SCC 909, this appeal deserves outright dismissal. Therefore, this appeal is rejected un-numbered.
