SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RJ) 11897

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
SUDESH BANSAL
SANJAY MAHESHWARI S/O RAMSWAROOP MAHESHWARI, – Appellant
Versus
PINKU AGRAWALA S/O PREM KUMAR AGARWAL – Respondent


Order

30/04/2024

1. In all four criminal misc. petitions u/s. 482 Cr.PC, a common issue has been raised by petitioner, claiming to put on halt the criminal proceedings against him for offence under Section 138 NI Act, due to invocation of moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter for short “the IBC 2016, hence with consent of counsel for both parties, all petitions have been heard together finally on merits and would stand decided by this common Order.

2. It is not in dispute that against petitioner four different criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act, have been filed on account of dishonour of cheques issued by the petitioner, wherein cognizance for offence u/s. 138 NI Act has been taken by the Judicial Magistrate against the petitioner and trial in the criminal complaints is yet to commence. Indisputably, the criminal complaints are pending before the Special Metropolitan Magistrate, dealing with cases under the NI Act.

3. During course of criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act, according to the petitioner, a moratorium period started as declared by the National Company Law Tribunal, Jaipur (hereinafter for short “the NCLT”) initially vide in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top