SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RJ) 24240

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
ARIHANT STEEL – Appellant
Versus
OM SALES – Respondent


Order

30/04/2024 The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C against order dated 23.04.2024, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate no.2, Bundi in complaint no. 2199/2017 whereby, application filed by the petitioner for granting two months time to produce the defence evidence has been rejected.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has received some relevant information from the Transport Department by way of filing an application before them to inquire about the truck numbers mentioned by the complainant in the bills. As per the information received by the petitioner from the Transport Department, it appears that truck numbers mentioned by complainant in the bills are not registered with the Transport Department. It is stated that no goods were supplied to the petitioner by the complainant. He submits that some information which has been sought from the Transport Department are still awaited.

With the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, counsel prays that one opportunity may be given to the petitioner to produce the defence evidence.

From bare perusal of the record, it appears that four opportunity were granted to the petitioner to prod

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top