SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(RJ) 20436

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
ARUN MONGA
MAHESH KUMAR KUMAWAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Vishwajeet Singh for Mr. Shree Kant Verma

Order

14/03/2024

1. Grievance of the petitioners herein is that they have been working on contractual basis as Helpers/ Computer Operators/ Pharmacists etc. and have rendered different duration of services as per the details more particularly provided in the petition herein which are not been adverted, being not relevant for the purpose of disposing of the present writ petition.

2. It is settled principle of service jurisprudence that one set of contractual employees ought not to be replaced by another set of contractual employees, unless of course either there is any contemplation of regular appointment on the post in question or the work of the employee is found to be unsatisfactory.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that notwithstanding the aforesaid proposition of law, the respondents are contemplating to replace the petitioners by engaging a fresh set of contractual employees in their place.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners be given liberty to file a representation before the Competent Authority, which may be taken up on administrative side and decided in accordance with law.

5. In the premise, the petitioners may file a representation as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top