Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J
ADAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S VISHAL STRUCTURALS PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts relevant for arbitration context. (Para 3) |
| 2. court's observations on arbitration notice sufficiency. (Para 4 , 5 , 38) |
| 3. ratio decidendi regarding tribunal jurisdiction. (Para 21 , 39) |
| 4. conclusion allowing the appeal and party impleadment. (Para 40 , 41 , 43) |
J U D G M E N T
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.
Contents Facts .................................................................................................................. 3 Arbitral Tribunal’s Decision on the Section 16 Application ................................ 7 Impugned Order ................................................................................................ 7 Submissions ...................................................................................................... 8 Issues .............................................................................................................. 10 Notice Invoking Arbitration under Section 21 of the ACA ................................ 10 Appointment of Arbitrator by the Court under Section 11 ............................... 15 Source of the Arbitral Tribunal’s Jurisdiction and Relevant Inquiry under Section 16 …..…………………………………………
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
