Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
BADRINARAYANA JAGANATHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident of harassment (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. fir lodged by complainant (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 3. high court's consideration (Para 8) |
| 4. appellants' contentions (Para 9) |
| 5. court's findings on ipc sections (Para 11) |
| 6. impugned order set aside (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
J U D G M E N T
THE APPEAL
2. The accused appellants, [appellants] - Madhushree Datta, [first accused] and Badrinarayana Jaganathan, [second accused] - have taken exception to the impugned order by presenting these appeals.
3. The proceedings before the ACMM have, as its genesis, an incident of 25th October, 2013. The second respondent as complainant, [complainant] lodged a complaint dated 26th October, 2013 with the Sub-Inspector of Police, H.A.L. Police Station, Marathahalli, Bangalore, against M/s Juniper Networks India Private Limited, [Company] and the appellants. The complainant asserted that she was employed as a Technical System Analyst at the Company, where she was subjected to ongoing harassment by the management. She claimed that she was coerced in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
