SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 444

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
NAMAMI GANGE AND RURAL WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT – Appellant
Versus
OM PRAKASH SINGH – Respondent
SLP(C) No.-004900 - 2023



NON-REPORTABLE

2025 INSC 40 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.4900 of 2023 NAMAMI GANGE AND RURAL WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT … Petitioner (s)

VERSUS OM PRAKASH SINGH AND OTHERS … Respondent(s)

WITH Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.4902 of 2023 AND Contempt Petition (Civil) No.1212 of 2023 in S.L.P.(C) No.3176 of 2023 (@ S.L.P. (C) No(s).3176-3177 of 2023)

J U D G M E N T Rajesh Bindal, J.

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.4900 of 2023 :

1. The present Special Leave Petition has been filed impugning the order, Dated 27.02.2020 passed by the High Court, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in the Writ Petition filed by the Respondent Nos.1 to 45 against the Respondent Nos.46 to 51. The High Court vide Common order dated 27.02.2020 decided the Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2025.01.08

Reason:

3 Service Bench No.651 of 2014

three Writ Petitions4, however, the present Special Leave Petition has been filed only against the order passed by the High Court in Service Bench No.651 of 2014.

2. The issue raised by the writ petitioners before the High Court was for the quashing of the certain orders passed by the authorities declining them the benefit of pay revision and consequential retiral benefits from 01.01.2006 and awarding the same from 12.03.2010. The High Court while quashing the order impugned directed the respondents in the writ petition to pay benefits of the Sixth Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.2006 as was provided to the State Government employees.

3. The fact remains that the order passed by the Single Bench of the High Court dated 27.02.2020 in the petitions5, where Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam was a party, was subject matter of challenge before the Division Bench of the High Court in the Special Appeal, Special Appeal Defective No.276 of 2020., which was dismissed vide order dated 09.11.2020.

4. Still not satisfied with the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court, Special Leave Petition7 was filed before this Court by State of Uttar Pradesh. The same was disposed by this Court

4 Service Single No.11991 of 2017, Service Bench No.651 of 2014 and Service Single No.154 of 2020

5 Service Single No.11991 of 2017

7 S.L.P.(C) No.3311 of 2022

on 20.05.2022. This Court while disposing of the aforesaid Special Leave Petition had directed that the amount be deposited in the GPF Account of the employees concerned within a period of six months from the date of order. On failure, the same shall carry interest @ 6% per annum. In case of the employees, who had retired on attaining the age of superannuation, four months’ time was granted to pay the arrears. On failure, interest was payable @ 6% per annum.

5. It would be out of place if it is not mentioned here that the Review Petition, Review Petition (C) No.1045 of 2022 filed against the aforesaid order was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 20.09.2022.

6. On account of non-compliance of the order dated 20.05.2022, some of the employees filed Contempt Application9 before the High Court in which notice was issued to the alleged contemnors. The High Court vide interim order dated 20.12.2022 in the aforesaid Contempt Application directed the respondents therein to comply with the order dated 20.05.2022 passed by this Court. The same was challenged before this Court by filing Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.3176-3177 of 2023. Noticing the fact that after this Court passed order on 20.05.2022, subsequent Review Petitions10 having been

9 Contempt Application (Civil)No.1998 of 2021

10 Review Petition (c) Diary No.34631 of 2022 and Review Petition (c) Diary No.34966 of 2022

dismissed on 29.11.2022 and 17.01.2023 respectively, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed by this Court on 10.02.2023. Four weeks further time was granted for compliance of the order. The relevant text of the order is extracted below:

“Considering the fact that the directions of which the non-compliance is alleged were issued as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top