Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 2189
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) No. 778 OF 2024 IN CIVIL APPEAL No. 8054 OF 2019 RATI RAM SHARMA & ORS. … PETITIONERS Versus LOKESH M. … RESPONDENT
O R D E R
1. Heard learned counsel/Senior Counsel for the parties.
2. It is not in dispute that the following payments have been received by the petitioners:
Sl.No. Name
Amount
Bank Account No.
Bank Name
IFS Code No.
1.
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Ved Prakash Son Gangaram Sharma
1,11,21,170.00
43902645083
State Bank of India, Sector- 11, Noida.
SBIN0011485
2.
Rati Ram Sharma Son Gangaram Sharma
1,11,21,170.00
059701000010243
Indian Overseas Bank, Sector- 31, Nithari, Noida
IOBA0000597
3. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date: 2025.04.01 4.
Meena Sharma Wife Kanchhiram urf Jagdish Pankaj Sharma Son Kanchhiram urf Jagdish
27,80,293.00 27,80,293.00
059701000010363 059701000050444
Indian Overseas Bank, Sector- 31, Nithari, Noida Indian Overseas Bank, Sector-
IOBA0000597 IOBA0000597
31, Nithari, Noida
5.
Neeraj Sharma Son Kanchhiram urf Jagdish
27,80,293.00
059701000050443
Indian Overseas Bank, Sector- 31, Nithari, Noida
IOBA0000597
6.
Archana Sharma Daughter Kanchhiram urf Jagdish
27,80,292.00
059701000050454
Indian Overseas Bank, Sector- 31, Nithari, Noida
IOBA0000597
7.
Indrajeet Son Vidyaram
11,19,44,127.00
14411000001641
Punjab & Sind Bank, Chamrawali Bodaki
PSIB0021441
8.
Ramvati Devi Wife Rajendra Prasad, Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Mool Chand Sharma, Munesh Kumar Sharma Son Rajendra Prasad
12,00,97,081.00
711610110004286
Bank of India, SSI, Bhangel, Noida
BKID0007116
9.
A.D.M.(L.A.), Noida
1,56,34,550.00
30048315796
State Bank of India, Collateral Compound, Greater Noida.
SBIN0005106
Total
28,10,39,269.00
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, submits that the due amount has not been paid to the petitioners as per the policy of Noida, which was applied in the case of similarly placed landowners.
4. We are of the considered view that such like issue cannot be gone into in the contempt proceedings.
5. The Contempt Petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioners or other similarly placed land-owners that in case their claim would not be satisfied, they may approach the Reference Court, who in turn, is directed to entertain such execution application(s), and pass appropriate orders after hearing both sides.
6. As a sequel to the above, the pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.
..............…...........J.
(SURYA KANT)
..............……...…….....J.
(NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH)
NEW DELHI;
MARCH 28, 2025.
ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.3 SECTION III-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CONMT.PET.(C) No.778/2024 in C.A. No.8054/2019 RATI RAM SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS LOKESH M. Respondent(s)
FOR ADMISSION and IA No.223478/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 31262/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 23860/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No. 223478/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date : 28-03-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH For Petitioner(s) Dr. Rajeev Sharma, AOR Mr. Viresh Kumar Bhawra, Adv.
Mr. Prashant Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Suresh Chand, Adv.
Mr. Raghuvir Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Vipin Kumar Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Meena Hasan, Adv.
Ms. Devjani Dekka Bharali, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Binay Kumar Das, AOR Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv.
Ms. Neha Das, Adv.
Mr. Shivam Saksena, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The Contempt Petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
As a sequel to the above, the pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.)
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file)
