SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
STATE BANK OF INDIA ASSISTANT MANAGER VS. INDIA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bank filed section 7 application (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. nclt condoned delay (Para 3) |
| 3. solicitor general's argument (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. nclt's error in restricting reliance (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. appeal allowed and order set aside (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
O R D E R
1. This Statutory Appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short, ‘IBC’) is at the instance of the appellant – State Bank of India seeking to challenge the order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai dated 04.10.2023 by which the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India and thereby affirmed the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Hyderabad.
2. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be summarized as under:-
i) In February, 2020, the Bank filed an application under Section 7 of the IBC before the NCLT.
ii) In November, 2021, the respondent – herein India Power Corporation Limited (IPCL) filed its counter affidavit before the NCLT.
iii) On 13.06.2022, the State Bank of India filed its rejoinder affidavit. However, in filing the rejoinder affidavit, there was a delay as according to the B
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.