SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 105840

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AP SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


O R D E R

1. We heard Mr. Shyam Divan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution inter alia praying for the following reliefs:-

a. Issue appropriate writ/order/directions quashing the inquiry proceedings i.e. via notice dated 20.02.2025, initiated under Section 26 Real Estate Regulatory Act read with Rule 35 of the MP RERA Rules bearing details as J-Disp-66/2025 against the petitioner pending before the inquiry committee constituted by the High Court of Madhya Signature Not Verified Pradesh, Jabalpur; and/ or Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date: 2025.03.27

18:13:12 IST Reason:

b. Issue appropriate writ/ order/ directions to call for the complete records in relation to the inquiry instituted under Sec. 26 of the RERA Act r/w Rule 35 of the MP RERA Rules bearing details as J-Disp-66/2025 against the petitioner pending before the inquiry committee constituted by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur.

c. Issue any appropriate order/ direction, calling for the necessary files, documents and records pertaining to the respondences between the respondent No.3 office/ Secretariat of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top