SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 1396

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MS MAJA DARUWALA . – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL . – Respondent


O R D E R

1. We have heard Mr. Soutik Banerjee, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nos. 1 and 2, Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, the learned A.S.G. appearing for the Union of India and Mr. Kunal Signature Not Verified Mimani, the learned counsel appearing for the State of West Bengal.

Digitally signed by CHANDRESH Date: 2025.03.01 Reason:

2. At the outset we take notice of the order passed by this Court dated 19th November, 2012, the order read thus:-

“We have heard Mr. S.K. Dholakia, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Soumitra G. Chaudhuri, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 -

State of West Bengal.

2. No body appears for the respondent No. 2 - Union of India, although vakalatnama has been filed on its behalf.

3. We have perused the order passed by the High Court on November 18, 2011 which reads as follows:

"Learned counsel for the petitioners brought to our notice that the Supreme Court of India is seized with the similar issues involved in this petition as it is dealing with the petition filed by one Bhim Singh (W.P. (Crl.) No. 310 of 2005 Bhim Singh vs. Union of India and others. It is submitted that the petitioners would like to apply before the Supreme Court o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top