The court ruled that failure to notify about the death of respondents absolves appellants from the obligation to bring legal representatives on record.

O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

2. The applicants are seeking review of the judgment and order dated 9th February, 2023 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court (cor. M.R. Shah and Hima Kohli, JJ.) partially allowing a bunch of civil appeals preferred by the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited and others1, challenging the judgment and order dated 5th July, 2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.

3. The only substantial ground on which a review could have been available is ground ‘B’. According to the applicants, the appeal came to be allowed by this Court without notice to some of them. Their predecessors having passed away, the appellants ought to have brought on record their legal representatives on record which they did not for reasons known to them.

4. There is no averment in the application for review that during the pendency of the civil appeals, intimation of death of the deceased respondents was given to the advocate-on-record for the appellants in terms of Order 22 Rule 10A of the Code of Civil Procedure , 19082. In the absence of any such intimation, the appellants cannot be faulted for not bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondents.

5. The other grounds raised in the application are beyond the parameters of Order 47 Rule 1 of the CPC as well as Order 47 of the Supreme Court Rules , 2013.

6. The application for review is, accordingly, dismissed.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.