Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
R.K PANDEY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent's claim for retirement age (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. respondent's reliance on service rules (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. existence of arbitration agreement questioned (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. absence of arbitration agreement nullifies awards (Para 21) |
| 5. appeal allowed, awards set aside (Para 25) |
J U D G M E N T
Delay condoned.
3. The facts, in brief, are – Respondent no. 1, R.K. Pandey, was appointed as a Lab Assistant/ Technician in the T.B. Section of Dina Nath Parbati Bangla Infectious Disease ,
5. On 20.06.1961, a transfer deed was executed between the Nagar Mahapalika of the City of Kanpur and the Governor of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The said deed has been placed on the record. It states that in terms of the G.O. dated 29.03.1957, the entire municipal staff of the hospital, as per the list attached to the indenture, will stand transferred to the State Government service. The staff will not be unfavourably placed as regards emoluments or other service condi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
