Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
R.K PANDEY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent's claim for retirement age (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. respondent's reliance on service rules (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. existence of arbitration agreement questioned (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. absence of arbitration agreement nullifies awards (Para 21) |
| 5. appeal allowed, awards set aside (Para 25) |
J U D G M E N T
SANJIV KHANNA, CJI.
Delay condoned.
2. This appeal arises from an order dated 28.02.2012 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in First Appeal from Order Defective No. 352/2012.
3. The facts, in brief, are – Respondent no. 1, R.K. Pandey, was appointed as a Lab Assistant/ Technician in the T.B. Section of Dina Nath Parbati Bangla Infectious Disease ,
4. On 17.07.1956, DNPBID Hospital was taken over by the State Government, that is, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, to establish a new medical college at Kanpur pursuant to a Resolution dated 17.07.1956 passed by the Administrator of the Municipal Board of Kanpur and six members
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
