SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 100739

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, JJ
SHABBAR KHAN VS. NATIONAL INVESTIGATIVE AGENCY
SLP(Crl) No. 17214/2024



Advocates:
Mr. P Vishwanath Shetty, Sr. Adv., Mr. Nizam Pasha, Adv., Mr. Mushtaq Salim, Adv., Mr. Vibhav Chaturvedi, Adv., Mr. Sidharth Kaushik, Adv., Ms. Awstika Das, Adv., Mr. Saiful Haque, Adv., Mr. Aditya Samaddar, AOR, Mr. Suryaprakash V.Raju, A.S.G., Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv., Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv., Mr. Hitarth Raja, Adv., Mr. Abhinav Mishra, Adv., Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR, Mr. G.Siddiramulu, Adv.

The establishment of additional Special Courts for NIA cases is essential to ensure speedy trials and compliance with constitutional mandates.

Headnote:(A) Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 - The court addressed the issue of inordinate delays in the trial of NIA cases, emphasizing the need for additional Special Courts to ensure speedy trials as mandated by Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. (Paras 48, 50)

(B) Compliance - The court directed compliance with Section 11 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, urging both Central and State Governments to expedite the establishment of additional Special Courts for NIA cases. (Paras 50)

(C) Judicial Administration - The court highlighted the backlog of cases pending before the Special Court and the necessity for the State Government to fulfill its obligations under the UAPA. (Paras 48, 50)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner highlighted the pendency of thirty-one NIA cases, fifty-three sessions cases, and two criminal miscellaneous matters before the Special Court, stressing the need for additional courts to handle the backlog.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the establishment of additional Special Courts for NIA cases within three months and emphasized the need for compliance with prior recommendations.

Issues: The main issues included the delay in trials of NIA cases and the necessity for additional Special Courts to handle the backlog.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the establishment of additional Special Courts is essential to prevent inordinate delays in the trial process, aligning with constitutional mandates for speedy justice.

Result: Special Leave Petition dismissed.

O R D E R

We have heard Shri P Vishwanath Shetty, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Shri Suryaprakash V. Raju, learned A.S.G. for the respondent at length.

We are not inclined to interfere in the matter.

The Special Leave Petition is hence dismissed.

However, during the course of submissions, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner brought to our notice the fact that the High Court of Karnataka in the case of Shoheb Ali & Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka ( Criminal Appeal No.72/2023 ), has recorded in paragraphs 48 and 50 of the order dated 20.04.2023 that there are as many as thirty one N.I.A. cases pending before the Special Court pertaining to different years. It is useful to extract the paragraphs below:

“48. Keeping in view the aforesaid principle, we got the information and statistical data from the Registrar (Judicial) about pendency of cases before the Special Court which is dealing with NIA cases. The Statement dated 12 th April 2023 furnished by the Registrar (Judicial) depicts that as on 28 th February 2023, 31 NIA cases are pending before the Special Court pertaining to different years, the details of which are as under:

Year to which NIA case relates toNumber of NIA cases pendingApproximate number of years from which NIA case is pending
201419 years
201528 years
201627 years
201736 years
201835 years
202035 years
202182 years
202251 year
20234

Apart from 31 NIA cases, 53 Sessions Cases and 2 Crl. Misc. matters are pending before the said Special Court as on 31 st March 2023.

xxx xxx xxx

50. ... It is high time for the State Government to fulfil the scope and object of the UA(P) Act and ensure speedy trial and disposal by constituting/establishing three more Special Courts for trial of NIA cases in other revenue Divisions of Karnataka viz., Mysore Division, Belagavi Division and Kalburgi Division. The present Special Court at Bengaluru assigned with the work of trial of NIA cases alongwith Sessions and other cases. If the NIA cases are less in the newly proposed Special Courts, the said Courts may be assigned with Sessions and other cases as has been done in respect of Special Court at Bangalore established for speedy disposal of NIA cases. If the newly proposed Special Courts are not constituted/established, one Special Court in the entire State would be overburdened and will lead to inordinate delay in trial and disposal of NIA cases, which is against the constitutional mandate as contemplated under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.”

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that apart from thirty one N.I.A. cases, fifty three sessions cases and two criminal miscellaneous matters were pending before the Special Court as on 31.03.2023.; That in the instant case in respect of the incident which is said to have taken place on 11.08.2020, as many as 254 witnesses have been listed before the Special Court in respect of this trial by the N.I.A. under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 ( UAPA ).

In the circumstances, we direct that there shall be compliance with Section 11 of the National Investigation Agency Act , 2008 both by the Central Government as well as by the State Government.

In this regard, our attention was drawn by learned A.S.G. to the proposal of the Ministry of Home Affairs for setting up of exclusive courts for trial of NIA cases and communication issued by the said Ministry dated 07.10.2024 to the Karnataka State Government and the Registrar General of the Karnataka High Court seeking their comments or consent for constitution of an exclusive Special Court at Bengaluru.

It was also brought to our notice that pursuant to order dated 20.04.2023 passed in Criminal Appeal No.72/2023 connected with Criminal Appeal No.183/2023, the recommendation issued to the State Government to establish three Special Courts in Mysore, Belagavi and Kalaburgi within a period of six months from date of that order has not yet been complied with.

Having regard to the aforesaid submissions ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top