Allegations must disclose necessary ingredients of a cognizable offence to justify the investigation.

Mehta, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant herein calls into question the order dated 20th July, 2020 passed by the learned Single Judge of High Court of Uttarakhand whereby Criminal Writ Petition No. 881 of 2020 preferred by the appellant for assailing FIR No. 31 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 153A, 500, 501, 504, 34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter being referred to as the ‘IPC’) at P.S. Muni Ki Reti, District Tehri Garhwal was dismissed.

Digitally signed by Deepak Singh Date: 2024.03.19 15:55:42 IST Reason:

Signature Not Verified

3. Shorn of details, the facts relevant and essential for disposal of the appeal are noted hereinbelow.

4. The respondent No.3 Shri Rajeev Savara filed a complaint to the SHO P.S. Muni Ki Reti, District Tehri Garhwal alleging inter alia that he owns land admeasuring 1.196 hectares(approximately 15.94 bighas) situated on National Highway No. 7 at village Singthali, Tehsil Narendra Nagar, District Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand. He had formed a trust by the name, Savara Foundation of which he is the founder and also Chairman of the Board of Trustees. He claimed to be an internationally recognised domain expert of pre-modern, modern visual and decorative Indian arts, having served on the advisory boards of various art galleries and museums.

5. The complainant had planned a foundation stone laying ceremony of ‘Matra Ashraya-A collection museum’ on the said land/property to be done by the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Uttarakhand, namely, Mr. Trivendra Singh Rawat, in the presence of Juna Peethadheeshwar Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Avdheshanand Ji Maharaj. The event was scheduled on 20th March, 2020.

6. It was alleged in the complaint that in order to blackmail the complainant, the accused named in the aforesaid FIR, acting in collusion, got published a news article in the e-newspaper ‘Parvatjan’, edition dated 17th March, 2020 wherein it was portrayed that the land on which the foundation stone was proposed to be laid was Government land which had been unlawfully occupied/encroached upon by the complainant. The complainant alleged that even his invitation was published in the defamatory news article. It was further alleged that the imputations were made in the news article with the intent and knowledge that the same would irreparably tarnish the reputation of the complainant and his standing in the public domain.

7. The complainant asserted that the sole objective of the publication was to incite breach of peace. The article was published without undertaking proper fact-finding exercise which as per the complainant, would have conclusively and indisputably established that he had not encroached upon Government land and that the plot in question was lawfully owned and occupied by the complainant. In this manner, the accused caused serious damage to the goodwill, reputation and standing of the complainant in the society. As per the complainant, the act of publication of the mischievous and malicious news article by the accused invited invocation of the offences punishable under Sections 153A, 500, 501, 504 read with Sections 34 and 120B IPC.

8. Based on the said complaint, FIR No. 31 of 2020 came to be registered at P.S. Muni Ki Reti, District Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand for the above offences.

9. The appellant filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 881 of 2020 in the High Court of Uttarakhand for challenging the said FIR claiming to be completely innocent and taking a plea that the allegations made in the FIR did not disclose commission of any cognizable offence. It was averred in the petition that the news article which had been published in the e-newspaper Parvatjan of which the appellant herein was the Director, was entirely based on the Facebook post of a journalist named Gunanand Jakhmola and as such, the appellant herein was not liable to face prosecution for the said publication.

10. As stated above, the High Court proce