1. Permission is granted to the petitioner to appear and argue in person.

2. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“1. To grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in respect of complaint No.6264/21 (original 434/07), titled Hansraj Vs. Vijay Bhushan Gautam, to the satisfaction of Ld. ACJ-IV (Sr. Div.), Ghaziabad.

2. It is requested & prayed that after taking into consideration of age & other vital factors, the petitioner may kindly be granted the benefit of Anticipatory Bail in respect of complaint no.6264/21 (original 434/07).

3. Any & such further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case.”

3. Having regard to the fact that the remedy of securing bail in anticipation of arrest is available to the petitioner under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) which he has not availed, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition in exercise of jurisdiction conferred on us by Article 32 of the Constitution.

4. However, our attention has been drawn to a revisional order of the Sessions Judge, Ghazi