SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 3299

MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ
PRADEEP RAVINDRA GARG – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:

ORDER

Digitally signed by satish kumar yadav Date: 2024.01.04 17:53:05 IST Reason:

    Signature Not Verified 1. Heard learned Senior Counsel/learned counsel for the parties for some time. Before considering the desirability of cancelling the bail granted to petitioner No.1, we deem it appropriate to issue the following directions: (i) The petitioners are directed to file their respective affidavits within two weeks giving full details of the immovable and movable assets owned by them, their family members and other legal entities in which they are Directors/Officers or have held any managerial position. (ii) The Investigating Agencies of the States of Maharashtra and Gujarat shall coordinate to ascertain the full details of the assets belonging to the petitioners. (iii) Learned counsel for the parties shall have instructions as to why a Committee be not constituted by this Court for the auctioning of the assets and disbursement of the sale proceeds amongst the investors by evolving a fair, just and equitable criteria. 3. Post the matter for further consideration on 31.01.2024. (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) D
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top