SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 3650

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SHAURABH KUMAR TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
MA-000923 - 2024



The court has discretion to dispose of applications deemed no longer relevant or necessary.

Headnote:(A) Miscellaneous Application No. 923/2024 in Crl.A. No.639/2024 - Application deemed infructuous - The court declined to entertain the application based on the nature of the prayer made, leading to its disposal as infructuous. (Paras 1, 2)

(B) Court's Discretion - The court has the discretion to dispose of applications that are no longer relevant or necessary. (Para 1)

Facts of the case:
The application was made in the context of a criminal appeal, and the counsel for the appellant indicated that the application had become infructuous.

Findings of Court:
The application was disposed of as infructuous, indicating the court's decision not to entertain it further.

Issues: The main issue was whether the application should be entertained or deemed infructuous.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized its discretion to dispose of applications that are no longer relevant, affirming that it is not inclined to entertain applications that do not warrant further consideration.

Result: Application disposed of as infructuous.

ORDER

Looking to the nature of prayer made in the application, we are not inclined to entertain the same. However, Learned counsel appearing for the appellant/applicant states that the application has become infructuous.

Application is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.

.

    Digitally signed by KAVITA PAHUJA Date: 2024.05.18 12:46:09 IST Reason:
    Signature Not Verified ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.7 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Miscellaneous Application No. 923/2024 in Crl.A. No.639/2024 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05- Court of India) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s) (IA No. 107517/2024 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) Date : 14-05-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
    CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kuldeep Rai, Adv. Mr. Aryan Dev Pandey, Adv. Mr. Manoj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ankur Jain, Adv. Mr. Shivam Adhikary, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Nikhil Dharnidhar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Pashupathinath Razdan, AOR Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Adv., Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R M.A. as well as Interlocutory application is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
    Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top