SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 11060

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
OMKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
C.A. No.-010611-010611 - 2024



The quantified disability alone does not disqualify a candidate from admission; individual capabilities must be assessed for eligibility under the PwD category.

Headnote:(A) Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Sections 2(m), 2(r), 2(y), 3, 15, and 32 - Medical Council of India Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997 - Notification dated 13.05.2019 - Admission eligibility criteria for persons with disabilities - The appellant, diagnosed with speech and language disability quantified at 44%/45%, was denied admission to MBBS course based solely on this percentage, which was challenged as discriminatory. The Court held that mere quantification of disability does not disqualify a candidate from admission if the Disability Assessment Board opines otherwise. (Paras 1-54)

(B) Discrimination - The Court emphasized that the principle of reasonable accommodation must be applied to ensure that candidates with disabilities are not unjustly excluded from educational opportunities. (Paras 16-48)

(C) Judicial Review - Decisions of Disability Assessment Boards can be challenged in judicial review proceedings, ensuring candidates receive fair consideration based on their actual capabilities rather than solely on quantified disability. (Paras 50-53)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, aspiring to pursue an MBBS degree, faced denial of admission due to a quantified disability percentage exceeding 40%. He contested the Medical Council of India's eligibility criteria as discriminatory and sought judicial intervention.

Findings of Court:
The Court ruled that the quantified disability alone should not disqualify candidates from pursuing medical education, emphasizing the need for a nuanced assessment of individual capabilities.

Issues: The main issue was whether a quantified disability of 40% or more should automatically disqualify a candidate from admission under the PwD category.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reasoned that the blanket exclusion based on disability percentage is contrary to the principles of equality and reasonable accommodation, which aim to facilitate the inclusion of persons with disabilities in education.

Result: The appeal is allowed, and the appellant is directed to be admitted to the MBBS course.

J U D G M E N T

K.V. Viswanathan, J.

1. Omkar Ramchandra Gond (the appellant) grew up in a middle-class family in the city of Latur in Maharashtra State. His father is a government servant. The appellant had a creditable academic performance in his tenth standard scoring 97.2%. He cleared his school final in the first division. The appellant aspired to be a doctor. Nothing wrong Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Deepak Singh with it, except that he had to surmount a few legal hurdles Date: 2024.10.15 14:09:52 IST Reason: enroute.

2. Admittedly, the appellant has speech and language disability and is diagnosed with Hypernasality with Misarticulation IN K/C/O Repaired Bilateral CLEFT of palate. The appellant is certified to have 45% (in some reports, it was mentioned as 44%) permanent disability as per the Disability Certificate dated 18.05.2017.

3. The appellant applied for the National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test NEET (UG), 2024 for admission to MBBS Course from the category of Persons with Disability (for short “PwD”) and Other Backward Classes (OBC) on 18.02.2024.

4. The application form had a disclaimer clause which stated that the eligibility under the PwD Category was purely provisional and was to be governed as per the National Medical Commission (NMC) guidelines regarding admission of students with “specified disabilities” under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (for short “RPwD Act”).

5. The appellant appeared for the NEET (UG) held on 05.05.2024 and qualified the entrance examination. The Schedule for Centralized Admission Process (CAP) Round-I counseling for admission was notified on 20.08.2024. The appellant applied for the centralized admission process and claimed reservation under the OBC and the PwD category. In the provisional merit list published on 26.08.2024, the name of the appellant figured at 42091. Under the Information brochure, candidates with disability have to submit a disability certificate issued for the year 2024 and have to undergo medical examination at the Disability Assessment Board.

6. The appellant approached the Designated Disability Certification Centre at Sir JJ Group of Hospitals on 16.08.2024. The Certification Centre certified that the appellant has physical disability of speech and language of 44% (in some reports, it was mentioned as 45%) and recorded that based on quantification of disability, the appellant was not eligible to pursue the medical course as per NMC norms. In view of that, the appellant was rendered ineligible person to obtain PwD reservation or to pursue medical course as per the NMC Gazette notification.

7. The Board of Governors of the Medical Council of India, the previous avatar of the NMC, had amended the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 1997, vide notification dated 13.05.2019. The existing Appendix “H” was substituted with Appendix “H-1” providing for guidelines regarding admission to students with “specified disabilities” under the RPwD Act with respect to admission in MBBS course. As per clause 1(D) thereof, persons who have equal to or more than 40% disability were not eligible for Medical Course. The relevant clause of the schedule is extracted hereinbelow:-

Type of DisabilitiesSpecified DisabilityDisability Range
Eligible for Medical Course, Not Eligible for PwD QuotaEligible for Medical Course, Eligible for PwD QuotaNot Eligible for Medical Course
D. Speech & language disability$Organic/neurological causesLess than 40% Disabil- ityEqual to or more than 40% Disability
$ Persons with Speech Intelligibility Affected (SIA) shall be eligible to pursue MBBS Courses, provided Speech Intelligibility Affected (SIA) score shall not exceed 3 (three), which is 40% or below. Persons with Aphasia shall be eligible to pursue MBBS Courses, provided Aphasia Quotient (AQ) is 40% or below.

Proceedings before the High Court:

8. Disappointed but by no means dispirited, the appellant moved the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in writ petition being W.P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top