Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 8897

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, SURAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. – Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).8250-8251/2024, SLP(C) No. 8321-8323/2024 (III), Diary No(s). 15401/2024 (III)

Advocates:
Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv., Mr. B.S. Patel, Sr. Adv., Mr. Amar Dave, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv., Mr. Nikunt Ravat, Adv., Mr. Zaki Sheikh, Adv., Mr. Abha Saigal, Adv., Ms. Lakshmi Iyer, Adv., Mr. Kartik Sharma, Adv., Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, AOR, Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv., Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv., Mr. Divyanshu Srivastava, Adv., Mr. Karan Verma, Adv., Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR, Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv., Ms. Misha Rohatgi, AOR, Mr. Nakul Mohta, Adv., Mr. Amulya Upadhyay, Adv., Mr. Puneet Pathak, Adv., Mr. Ayush Kashyap, Adv., Mr. Alok Bhachawat, Adv., Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya, AOR, Mr. Yadh Singhania, Adv., Mr. Deepan Desai, Adv., Mr. Anmol Gupta, Adv., Mr. Yash Singhania, Adv.

The court's discretionary power under Article 136 of the Constitution to grant or refuse special leave to appeal.

Headnote:
Dismissal - Special Leave Petitions - Article 136 of the Constitution
Fact of the Case:

The case involves the dismissal of several Special Leave Petitions filed under Article 136 of the Constitution.
Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, stating that it is not inclined to entertain them under Article 136 of the Constitution.
Issues: The main issue before the court was the admissibility of the Special Leave Petitions filed under Article 136 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to dismiss the Special Leave Petitions was based on its discretion under Article 136, which allows the court to grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, or order in any cause or matter passed or made by any court or tribunal in the territory of India.
Final Decision: The Special Leave Petitions were dismissed.

ORDER

SLP (C) Nos 8250-8251 of 2024

We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petitions under Article 136 of the Constitution.

2. The Special Leave Petitions are accordingly dismissed.

3. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

SLP (C) Nos 8321-8323 of 2024

4. After the dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions filed by the Agriculture Produce Market Committee [SLP(C) Nos 8250-8251 of 2024], Mr Nidhesh Gupta, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that his client is advised to withdraw the Special Leave Petitions so as to enable the petitioner to work out its remedy before the High Court in regard to the investment which has been made in the project.

5. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No 15401 of 2024

6. Permission to file the Special Leave Petitions granted.

7. We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petitions under Article 136 of the Constitution.

8. The Special Leave Petitions are accordingly dismissed.

9. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 8897

SUPREME COURT OF INDIAJ.B. PARDIWALA, J.AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, SURAT – AppellantVersusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. – RespondentPetition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).8250-8251/2024, SLP(C) No. 8321-8323/2024 (III), Diary No(s). 15401/2024 (III)

The court's discretionary power under Article 136 of the Constitution to grant or refuse special leave to appeal.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, SURAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. – Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).8250-8251/2024, SLP(C) No. 8321-8323/2024 (III), Diary No(s). 15401/2024 (III)