SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 5218

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ROHINI RAJU KHAMKAR – Appellant
Versus
RAJU RANBA KHAMKAR – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

I

1. After the mediation had failed, the respondent-husband was directed by us on 26.02.2024, to pay all the arrears of maintenance to the petitioner-wife within four weeks and file a Compliance Affidavit. The respondent-husband did not comply with that order. Learned counsel for the respondent-husband made a statement on 10.04.2024 that he has refused to give instructions to her. She was consequently discharged from the matter. The respondent was advised to engage a new counsel or appear in person.

2. Digitally signed by satish kumar yadav Date: 2024.05.15 18:30:58 IST Reason:

    Signature Not Verified Court was informed that the respondent-husband is connected online as he wants to appear in person. Despite sending a message and making efforts from our side, the respondent has not joined online.
    In such circumstances, we direct, as an interim measure, that Flat No.202, Kinjal Cooperative Housing Society, Building No.14, Prem Jyot Housing Complex, Mumbai-400 043 be attached. The Prescribed Authority is directed to make entry to this effect in the municipal records. The respondent is restrained from encumbering or creating third party rights in respect of the said flat.

3. During

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top