SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 5165

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KASIM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. Notice was issued only limited to quantum of sentence.

The appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, “the IPC ”). He has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years which is the maximum sentence under Section 306 of the IPC .

3. Perusal of the judgment of the Trial Court shows that no reasons have been recorded why maximum sentence has been imposed. Even in the judgment of the High Court, there is no discussion on this aspect.

4. After having perused the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, we find that in the facts of the case, rigorous imprisonment for 5 years will be the appropriate sentence.

Digitally signed by KAVITA PAHUJA Date: 2024.05.04 12:40:30 IST Reason:

    Signature Not Verified

5. We, accordingly, modify the impugned judgment passed by the Trial Court and confirmed by the High Court and direct that the substantive sentence of the appellant shall be of rigorous imprisonment for 5 years.

6. The appeal is partly allowed on above terms.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

......................J. (ABHAY S. OKA) ......................J. (UJJ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top