SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 12500

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
ABDUL REJAK LASKAR – Appellant
Versus
MAFIZUR RAHMAN – Respondent


JUDGMENT

J.B. PARDIWALA, J. :-

For the convenience of exposition, the present judgment is divided into the following parts:

INDEX

A. FACTUAL MATRIX ............................................................................................ 2

B. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT / PLAINTIFF ......... 10

C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS / DEFENDANTS ................................................................................................................................ 11

D. ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 15

i. What is Partition? ............................................................................................... 16

ii. Order XX Rule 18 of the CPC ............................................................................ 22

iii. When does Section 154(1)(e) bar the jurisdiction of civil courts? ..................... 33

E. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................... 41

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises from the judgment and order passed by the Gauhati High Court in Regular Second Appeal No. 243

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top