SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DINESH GOYAL @ PAPPU – Appellant
Versus
SUMAN AGARWAL (BINDAL) – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
SANJAY KAROL, J.
Leave granted.
2. Impugned in this appeal is a judgment and order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior Bench, passed in M.P. No.1695 of 2018 dated 21st August, 2019. The application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of
1 2 Civil Procedure, 1908 , by respondent No.1 was allowed setting aside order dated 14th March, 2018 passed by the 8th Civil Judge, Class-2, Gwalior, Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Dr.
Naveen Rawal Date: 2024.09.24
13:43:08 IST Reason:
1 ‘CPC’ for short
2 Hereinafter referred to as ‘the plaintiff’
District Gwalior in Civil Suit No.241-A/2016, whereby such application stood rejected.
3. The limited question that arises for our consideration is whether the High Court committed an error in allowing the amendment to the plaint filed by the present respondents.
4. The facts, shorn of unnecessary detail, as necessary for disposal of the present appeal are:-
3
4.1 The appellant and respondents, are siblings being children of Smt. Katoribai. The dispute relates to House No.27/1695, renumbered as 1695/1804 situated at Gangamai Santar, Murar, District Gwalior, M.P.4 , which was purchased by way of registered sale deed dated 1st J
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.